Re: httpd 2.2.8 segfaults

2008-02-21 Thread Brian Rectanus
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Niklas Edmundsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: In any case, I should probably try to figure out how to reproduce this thing. All coredumps I've looked at have been when serving DVD images, which of course works

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-20 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 9/19/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 11:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port. Plüm wrote: 1. Please provide a

Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented

2007-05-21 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 5/21/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 19, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 05/19/2007 04:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote: On 5/18/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently ProxyTimeout does not work as documented as the default value is not 300 secs,

SSL backend performance [Was: mod proxy disabling workers after a single error]

2007-05-21 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 5/5/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05.05.2007 04:25, Brian Hayward wrote: BTW, I did test my patch when 1 host was down in a balancer configuration. It still seemed to work well. I would think so. My point was more about that with this setting the response times of your

2.2.x as a transparent reverse proxy

2006-12-08 Thread Brian Rectanus
Hello all, I am currently looking into development for using httpd 2.2 as a transparent reverse proxy. Something similar to squid+cttproxy in reverse proxy mode. I wanted to check with the list to see if anyone has looked into or done any development towards something similar to this before I

Re: 2.2.x as a transparent reverse proxy

2006-12-08 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 12/8/06, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fre 2006-12-08 klockan 22:04 + skrev Nick Kew: How does a transparent reverse proxy differ from a reverse proxy as we know and document it? The Linux cttproxy patch allows proxies to be fully transparent masquerading using the

Re: 2.2.x as a transparent reverse proxy

2006-12-08 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 12/8/06, Michael Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian Rectanus wrote: Yeah, sorry. Should have been a bit more verbose there ;) I need client IP on the backend to deal with auth and logging. I cannot always control the backend server or config, so not always possible to work around

Backport for mod_proxy_balancer env additions [Was: load balancer and http(s) sticky sessions]

2006-11-03 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 9/15/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/15/2006 07:41 PM, Brian Rectanus wrote: I am thinking that there is still not a way to check if BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE == BALANCER_SESSION_ROUTE at response time since I think 'SetEnvIf response ...' will not resolve env vars

Re: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.2.3 mod_proxy issue]

2006-10-30 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 10/29/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a related note, our practice with mod_jk is to route only *.jsp, /servlet/*, and a few other URL patterns to Tomcat and let Apache handle everything else. We also want to support load balancing with sticky sessions, of course. That

Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] setenvif filter]

2006-09-29 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 9/29/06, Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bringing this up. again. Adds a filter that allows mod_setenvif to act on response headers. FWIW, I like it :) Have been wanting to do it myself, but have not found the time. -B

Re: load balancer and http(s) sticky sessions

2006-09-15 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 9/14/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/14/2006 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: or even Header add Set-Cookie MYCOOKIE=SOMEVALUE.%{BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE}e; path=/; env=BALANCER_ROUTE_CHANGED ProxyPass /test balancer://mycluster/test stickysession=MYCOOKIE

Re: mod_proxy and Proxy-Connection: keep-alive under HTTP/1.0

2006-08-03 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 8/3/06, Dmitry Butskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that most browsers (Mozilla, IE) send also Proxy-Connection: keep-alive header. IE6 sends it too when uses CONNECTION ... HTTP/1.0. This header is similar to ordinary Connection: keep-alive header, which alters the behaviour of

Re: svn commit: r417238 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c

2006-06-27 Thread Brian Rectanus
Hi, On 6/27/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian Rectanus wrote: On 6/26/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thinking of it more deeply, the only valuable env var would be BALANCER_SESSION_ROUTE. All other parms are meaningless for the client unless you wish to create

Re: svn commit: r417238 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c

2006-06-26 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 6/26/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: rpluem Date: Mon Jun 26 09:59:38 2006 New Revision: 417238 +apr_table_setn(r-subprocess_env, + BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE, (*worker)-s-route); + Thinking of it more

[Patch 39806] Add env vars to mod_proxy_balancer to allow more control

2006-06-20 Thread Brian Rectanus
Hello all, I have a minor patch to mod_proxy_balancer that I would like to get applied. The patch adds some environment vars to balancer requests to export info on the chosen route so that it possible to control sticky sessions entirely from the reverse proxy instead of modifying the backend