Hep pease unscripe !!
Aight, so since this has moved elsewhere, I thought I'd tell
the people who may have initially been interested in the
code.
You can now grab it here: http://ekhtml.sf.net
Should be handy for creating Apache filters that want to mangle
content before shipping it to the browser.
-- Jon
Jeff,
I cc'd the dev@ lists, since the original proposition was made there,
and the public following the discussion should know the resolution.
My comments at the end.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:45:21PM +, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Hi Jon,
As you well know, it has taken a while to reach a
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:25:00PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:55:35PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
Snip
I've decided to host the project elsewhere. It would be extremely
frustrating to require you, the ASF, to review code I'm patching
to code I initially wrote, given
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:21:04PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
Ok, since I'm not seeing any activity towards getting this
integrated, I'd like to set a deadline. This would help
me out, since it gives direction as to where
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:57:06AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
The ASF is apparently not about working together, since I (and
everyone else who is not on the PMC list) have been entirely left
out of all this conversation which is going on behind closed doors.
Which closed doors are
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:47:01AM -0700, Scott Hess wrote:
[I am not an Apache contributor, merely a lurker, but...]
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jon Travis wrote:
These are not coercive tactics. These are processes which are
beneficial to both the ASF and Covalent. I cannot continually
Time for another ping. It's been 2 weeks. Any word?
-- Jon
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:32:16PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
Hi all...
Jon Travis here...
Covalent has written a pretty keen HTML parser (called el-kabong)
which we'd like to offer to the ASF for inclusion in APR-util
of
time energy.
Anyway, I'd like to give an additional week to the ASF
to deal with the code. Next Monday, if it hasn't been
decided I'll look into other options.
-- Jon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:36:21AM -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
Time for another ping. It's been 2 weeks. Any word?
-- Jon
to be +1 for including your parser somewhere in some Apache project in the
future, there's just no clear concensus on where. Is there any reason you
can't just release your project under the ASF license and be done with it?
Later,
scott
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Jon Travis wrote:
Ok, since I'm
My comments inline:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are currently two possible avenues.
1) The code goes into apr-util.
2) The code goes into a sandbox project.
The APR option is faster, but there is some misgivings about whether it
belongs
Any word on this?
-- Jon
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:32:16PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
Hi all...
Jon Travis here...
Covalent has written a pretty keen HTML parser (called el-kabong)
which we'd like to offer to the ASF for inclusion in APR-util (or
whichever other umbrella it fits under
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 06:42:39PM +0200, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jon Travis wrote:
Any word on this?
These things take time... and it pays off to do them well. There is
absolutely no rush.
Just wanted a word. More often than not, when something stops
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:29:24AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2002
at 02:24:28PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote:
+1 from me, I prefer APR actually.
I am really uncomfortable with this going under the APR project. As
things stand right now, it just doesn't fit with what we
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:30:35PM -0700, Sander van Zoest wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jon Travis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:29:24AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: On Thu, Aug 29,
2002 at 02:24:28PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I will make one exception to that statement. If it lands
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:47:58AM -0700, daniel wrote:
A couple of notes on the parser:
- It is pretty lightweight and self contained
- This HTML parser can be used for a multitude of applications, in Apache
2.0 filter modules. The filter processes content generated by Apache or proxied
, a subproj under HTTPD
Jon Travis wrote:
I personally think it belongs as some kind of sub-project to httpd, but
not in the same tree.
-- Jon
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:43:17PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:02:47AM -0400
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:24:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume everyone has seen this?
http://dammit.lt/apache-worm/
Me and Fede are running through the decompiled assembly code
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 09:54:16PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:43 PM 5/20/2002, you wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Context?
httpd links in expat, perl extension links against a different version of
expat. both have the same symbol names, and they
Apache uses PCRE for a few regexp operations, but external modules which
try to use other symbols (such as get_substring) el-kabong because Apache
isn't importing it.
So, should:
a) all these modules be linking in all of the PCRE symbols into themselves
or
b) Apache include PCRE symbols as
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:16:52PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Monday 12 November 2001 11:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jwoolley01/11/12 23:06:42
Modified:.CHANGES
Log:
I was originally just going to s/commans/commas/, and then I got
carried away and rewrote
I'm checking my httpd.conf file to see if there is something weird
there. I am indeed sending a valid GET with a huge content-length.
-- Jon
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 08:15:44PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
O... I think I see the problem. In
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:43:12AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: Jon Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:18 AM
I'm checking my httpd.conf file to see if there is something weird
there. I am indeed sending a valid GET with a huge content-length
comment out the following 2 lines:
AddHandler type-map var
DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var
Within the Directory for the htdocs, then the memory will go through the
roof with the method I described.
-- Jon
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:12:47AM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
Jon Travis
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 03:46:14PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jon Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's possible to make Apache eat up all available memory on a system
by sending a GET with a large Content-Length (like several hundred MB),
and then sending that content
Like I said in my follow up post to my original, you don't even
need to post the data to actually have this occur. I telneted
to the server, and let it sit there for like 47 minutes before
I killed it. I never had it time out.
-- Jon
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:51:59AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
It seems that there is a possibility for DoS on Apache servers
when doing a POST. On search.apache.org, I can send the following
request:
PUT / HTTP/1.1
Host: search.apache.org:80
Content-Length: 1000
newline here
And just let it sit there forever. search.apache.org is running 2.0.24,
and I'm
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:16:24PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 11:37 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:26 PM
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:52:12PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:20:35PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:44 AM
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 08:17 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Why not let the MPM register the lingerclose with APR_HOOK_MIDDLE in
I've got a bit of code that needs to run after a connection to a client
has been closed. Right now I can (kind of) spoof this by setting the
keepalive for the client to 0, and registering a cleanup on the
request_req pool. Unfortunately the code in there is somewhat bulky,
so any subsequent
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:01:21PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Travis wrote:
I've got a bit of code that needs to run after a connection to a client
has been closed. Right now I can (kind of) spoof this by setting the
keepalive for the client to 0
I tried setting keepalive == 0 in the handler, and doing my ju-ju in
the log_transaction phase. The client was still hanging around.
-- Jon
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:11:58PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Monday 17 September 2001 03:52 pm, Jon Travis wrote:
Why can't you do
32 matches
Mail list logo
