clang-analyzer?

Howdy, I ran clang-analyzer against the HTTPD master branch, and it found 126 issues. Many of these are benign, but I was curious if the community has any thoughts on this? With another project, I’ve found that keep static code analysis to zero issues can really help finding new, serious issues

Re: how make backend applications aware about tls-offloading

> On Jan 7, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 07.01.2017 um 22:53 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> something like below where "X-TLS-Offloading" is only evaluated from >>> "RemoteIPInternalProxy" pyhsical addressess >>> >>>

Re: httpd and letsencrypt

> On Aug 29, 2016, at 5:17 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski > wrote: > Also, and this is personal, I don't tend to "trust" entities > with non-public membership: > > https://github.com/orgs/letsencrypt/people >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.20 as GA

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.20 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.20 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh

Re: Branching for 6.1.x tomorrow

> On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’m planning on branching 6.1.x tomorrow afternoon, so please take a look at > your Jira’s, and update / move them accordingly. sorry about the wrong dev@ list :-/. — leif

Branching for 6.1.x tomorrow

Hi all, I’m planning on branching 6.1.x tomorrow afternoon, so please take a look at your Jira’s, and update / move them accordingly. Cheers, — leif

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.18 as GA

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.18 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.18 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.16 as GA

> On Jul 10, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.16 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.16 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.15 as GA

> On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found > at the usual place: > >http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.13 as GA

> On Jun 4, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.13 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.13 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: me

[API proposal] TSHttpTxnCacheLookupUrlSet()

This new API is the inverse of an existing API, TSHttpTxnCacheLookupUrlGet(). It also works similar to another existing API, TSCacheUrlSet(). The main difference between this new API and TSCacheUrlSet() is that we work on normal URL objects. This can in some cases avoid unnecessary string conver

Re: Proposal/RFC: "informed" load balancing

I’m Cc: this to d...@trafficserver.apache.org, since I think this is something some of our dev would be interested in. There are a few other replies to this thread already, which can be seen on the archives. As has been mentioned in another reply, I think the header name ought to be something ^

Re: Version check idea

> On Apr 21, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:00:05 +0200 > Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > >> On 21 Apr 2015, at 15:55, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> For comment: What do people think about adding the capability that >>> when httpd is started, it tries to access htt

Re: [APACHECON] Proposed httpd (and related) track

> On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:11 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:06:14 -0700 > Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> >>> On Feb 10, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> Here's my proposed httpd (and related) track. I

Re: [APACHECON] Proposed httpd (and related) track

> On Feb 10, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Here's my proposed httpd (and related) track. If anyone has any objections, > changes, suggestions, whatever, please speak up. Thanks. > > > Day 1: > > * Panel: The Apache Group greybeards: If I'd only known then (Don’t yet have > confir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.12 as GA

> On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Am 26.01.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Eric Covener: >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> svn diff https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.11 >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.12 |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.12 as GA

> On Jan 22, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.12 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.12 GA. > > [X] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.11 as GA

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.11 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.11 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: m

Re: disable SSLv3 the same way SSLv2 was disabled in mod_ssl

ither distributed by package managers, or the person installing / managing the software. Cheers, — Leif > > -- > Tim Bannister - is...@c8h10n4o2.org.uk > > > >> On 2 Jan 2015, at 19:38, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> We disabled SSLv3 in the defaults f

Re: disable SSLv3 the same way SSLv2 was disabled in mod_ssl

We disabled SSLv3 in the defaults for Traffic Server as well. It's still available to be explicitly turned on though. -- Leif > On Jan 2, 2015, at 12:18 PM, olli hauer wrote: > >> On 2015-01-02 19:31, Tim Bannister wrote: >>> On 2 Jan 2015, at 18:18, olli hauer wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>

Re: CI for httpd 2.4 and trunk?

This is pretty interesting. A project I work on, Traffic Server, needs to improve the test infrastructure as well. In particular we need better integration and end-to-end tests. It feels there ought to be significant overlap here between ATS and HTTPD? Maybe we could pool development efforts? C