Re: Preferred service for patch

Hello Luca, thank you for your reply! On 08/04/2020 18:26, Luca Toscano wrote: > maybe the best path would > be to open a bugzilla task explaining the problem etc.. and > referencing any github pull requests in there (as opposed to attach > the patch directly for example). Ok, this way to contri

Preferred service for patch

Hello, it's possible to provide patch for httpd via bugzilla [1] or Pull Request via github [2]. What is the favorite place to contribute? 1: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/ 2: https://github.com/apache/httpd Regards, Stéphane signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Request for code review

Hello, I've created a bug report (#63079)[1] and attached a patch to fix it. Christophe Jaillet helped me about it but he currently lacks of free time. Could someone code review the last version of the patch? It's not complicated but it's my first real one on httpd (previous one was spellchecki

Re: Trying to compile httpd trunk

Le dim. 29 déc. 2019 à 03:17, Tom Donovan a écrit : > I built successfully from the trunk on a Debian 11 (Bullseye) system using > the commands below. Thank you Tom! It works. :) In case it helps someone, there were some missing packages (libnghttp2-dev and some libprcre* libraries) and the '--

Re: Trying to compile httpd trunk

Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 19:02, Nick Kew a écrit : > I take it you have a good reason to want that rather than a packaged version > such as Debian's? I'd like to provide a patch to a (whishlist) bug report I've done (#63079). > What did buildconf tell you? > > > According to the INSTALL file, I c

Re: Trying to compile httpd trunk

Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 11:32, Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group a écrit : > > make extraclean > > ./buildconf > > ./configure > > make > > make install Thanks for `make extraclean` but the error is still there. I tried with ./buildconf in srclib/apr/ ans srclib/apr-util/ before ./builconf in http

Re: Trying to compile httpd trunk

Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 19:05, Michal Karm Babacek a écrit : > > The last time I did this (a week or so ago on RHEL 7.6), > I had to checkout both apr and apr-util, their 1.x branches, not trunk. > Thanks for your help! I tried with branches 1.x but it fails with the same error: $ rm -rf srclib/

Trying to compile httpd trunk

Hello, I fail to compile apache2 from trunk on Debian testing. According to the INSTALL file, I check outed `apr` trunk in srclib/apr. After adding several lacking packages, it seems ./configure is ok. (The full output is in attachment.) $ ./configure --prefix=/home/stephane/bin/http --with-incl

Re: Is it interesting to add some filepath checks to apachectl -t ?

Le lun. 14 janv. 2019 à 18:33, William A Rowe Jr a écrit : > > There should not be a 'warn' level emit for a non-existent directory. Unlike > the > DocumentRoot or Alias, which are searched, blocks describe > protection. It's entirely reasonable to protect paths which aren't physically > on > t

Re: Is it interesting to add some filepath checks to apachectl -t ?

Hello, sorry for the huge delay :/ >>> On 03/07/2018 22:57, Stéphane Blondon wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> `apachectl -t` checks the configuration files. The documentation >>>> explains it's not complete. >>>> It s

Re: Is it interesting to add some filepath checks to apachectl -t ?

Hello, sorry to come back but I get no replies so I don't know if it has been ignored because considered as not good or you were too busy with the last release. Regards, Stéphane On 03/07/2018 22:57, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > Hello, > > `apachectl -t` checks the configurat

Is it interesting to add some filepath checks to apachectl -t ?

Hello, `apachectl -t` checks the configuration files. The documentation explains it's not complete. It seems paths (for DocumentRoot for example) or the write access for log directory are not checked. (tested with apache v.2.4.25.) Are you interested by such a feature? If I understand the code pr