Re: often mod_proxy cache revalidates

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:06:38PM +0200, pgajdos wrote: > 8< > mkdir -p /tmp/apache-rex/mod_proxy-cache/htdocs-backend > echo 'Backend for reverse' > > /tmp/apache-rex/mod_proxy-cache/htdocs-backend/index

Re: often mod_proxy cache revalidates

Hi, how to more easily reproduce: with following configuration file, located e. g. in /tmp/apache-rex/mod_proxy-cache/httpd.conf: On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:01:59PM +0200, pgajdos wrote: > --8< > ServerName test >

often mod_proxy cache revalidates

Hi, from 2.4.48 on, mod_proxy-cache example [1] begins to fail for me. Unfortunately I can not manage to expose this issue outside apache-rex framework sofar. With 2.4.46, I can not see this at all. $ git clone https://github.com/pgajdos/apache-rex.git $ cd apache-rex $ ./run-rex mod_proxy-cache

SSLFIPS on/off

Hello, I have a question regarding the logic around SSLFIPS on/off. After https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1853197 I think SSLFIPS off will not work as expected. #ifdef HAVE_FIPS if (sc->fips) { if (!FIPS_mode()) { if (FIPS_mode_set(1)) {

Re: Fwd: t/modules/{brotli,deflate}.t: handle the case < 2.4.42

Hi! On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:32:11PM +0100, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: >In other word, what is the "semantic" behind the test framework? > - Testing against regression only? (in this case including Petr's >patch makes sense to me) - or - > - Checking that the

Re: [testsuite] MergeSlashes was added recently

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 07:47:14AM -0400, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:36 AM pgajdos wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > please see the proposed patch in the attachement. > > Thanks Petr, applied in 1855981 Thanks for both! Petr

Re: [testsuite] negotiation.t: fails for older versions

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:15:04AM +0100, pgajdos wrote: > Hello, > > I propose following patch, as PR39730 was fixed recently. What do you think about the patch? Should it be amended somehow? Thanks! Petr

[testsuite] MergeSlashes was added recently

Hello, please see the proposed patch in the attachement. Petr Index: httpd-framework/t/apache/mergeslashes.t === --- httpd-framework.orig/t/apache/mergeslashes.t 2019-03-21 08:49:48.086794262 +0100 +++

Re: [testsuite] buffer.t: fails randomly

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 09:48:10PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 29/01/2019 à 14:59, pgajdos a écrit : > > 4, 8 and 12 subtests of buffer.t are randomly failing for me. I have > Hi, there has been some discussion about this new test added in r1841508 > > See >   

[testsuite] buffer.t: fails randomly

Hello, tested with 2.4.37 and 2.4.38. 4, 8 and 12 subtests of buffer.t are randomly failing for me. I have already seen to fail zero, one, two or all of them. When none fails, the test is done in very few seconds (including initialization of t/TEST). $r->code of the failing subtest is: 200

[testsuite] negotiation.t: fails for older versions

Hello, I propose following patch, as PR39730 was fixed recently. --- t/modules/negotiation.t.orig2019-01-29 07:49:18.495899602 + +++ t/modules/negotiation.t 2019-01-29 07:52:38.428960368 + @@ -8,7 +8,11 @@ use Apache::TestUtil; ## mod_negotiation test (see extra.conf.in)

Re: 2.4.38

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:15:07PM +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > even those distro package maintainers get sick to F'n death of it after > a while and skip updates. I do not see any reason I should get distinguished by it. Frequent version updates are even better for me. Petr

Re: alias.t/extra.conf.in change 1829008

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:51:56PM +0200, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > One thing I noticed is insufficient version checking of httpd version, > Well, it is sometimes hard to figure out when a given feature or directive > has been added. Especially when tests are added a long time