Yes, split process control from mod_fcgid, merge proxy_fcgi(with
load balance) and mod_fcgid(with authXX support) is a good idea,
admins can use httpd as process manager, or 3rd party process managers as they
like.
But don't just make a patch to make mod_fcgid support TCP/IP, it's ugly...
Hi, guys
A company need a TCP/IP patch of mod_fcgid or alternative, and will pay
for it, anyone interested? I really like to take it but I don't have too much
time...
Anyone interested please reply to me and I will forward the email address of
them.
Our company is hosting a website with
Hi, all
I took some times to setup a stress test for mod_fcgid, to see is there any
other concurrency bottleneck left, it seems fine to me.
I did a stress test with callgrind on mod_fcgid, this is the big picture:
http://people.apache.org/~pqf/mod_fcgid_performance/performance.png
Some C compilers don't support this: result[2*APR_MD5_DIGESTSIZE+1] ?
Hello, dev@.
I request a little change to HTTPD code.
On line 58 of server/util_md5.c, please replace
char *r, result[33]; /* (MD5_DIGESTSIZE * 2) + 1 */
with
char *r, result[2*APR_MD5_DIGESTSIZE+1];
There's
(or
mod_fcgid) either drop client connections or delay a while, there is no other
way out?
Another question. Is it necessary to call procmgr_init_spawn_cmd() from inside
the for loop ?
I took a brief look, it seems not necessary. I will move it out of loop and
test.
2012-08-28
pqf
发件人：Lazy
发送时
procmgr_post_spawn_cmd(maybe it should be renamed to procmgr_send_spawn_cmd)
will keep blocking while PM is creating a new process, after
procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() return, there should be a process ready there waiting
for accept.
2012-08-16
pqf
发件人：William A. Rowe Jr.
发送时间：2012-08-16 15
How about this:
1. procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() now return a status code from PM, so process
handler now know the spawn request is denyed or not.
2. if a new process is created, no sleep is needed.
3. if no process is created, sleep a while
2012-08-16
pqf
发件人：Lazy
发送时间：2012-08-16 16:47
主题：Re
again */
+bucket_ctx-procnode = apply_free_procnode(r, fcgi_request);
+if (bucket_ctx-procnode)
+break;
}
/* Connect to the fastcgi server */
2012-08-15
pqf
发件人：Mike M
发送时间：2012-08-15 04:29
主题：mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue
this sleep(), the server work fine without
bottleneck(Maybe he didn't notise the warm up issue?), so I thought remove the
sleep() is a good idea. But reduce the time of sleep() is fine to me too.
Any other idea?
Regards,
Ryan Pan
2012-08-16
pqf
发件人：Lazy
发送时间：2012-08-15 21:48
主题：Re: mod_fcgid
Hi， Mike
It's really a problem...I will take a look and find a solution for it
2012-08-15
pqf
发件人：Mike M
发送时间：2012-08-15 04:29
主题：mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人：devdev@httpd.apache.org
抄送：
Ahoy!
With mod_fcgid I've observed a performance bottleneck in which concurrent
Hi, guys
Here is the new patch, anyone review it? I will commmit it if no one respond :)
Index: fcgid_proc_unix.c
===
--- fcgid_proc_unix.c (revision 1099314)
+++ fcgid_proc_unix.c (working copy)
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@
Hi, all
Another question, does proc_wait_process() should update procnode-proc_id to 0
too? or else mod_fcgid may send a signal to another irrelevant process while
apache is shutting down? I don't follow up mod_fcgid for a while, I just took a
glance, maybe it's updated somewhere else?
By the
, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:19 PM, pqf p...@mailtech.cn wrote:
I man seteuid in my Linux box, there are two types of errors:
ERRORS
The seteuid() function shall fail if:
EINVAL The value of the uid argument is invalid and is not supported
by the implementation.
EPERM The process
I man seteuid in my Linux box, there are two types of errors:
ERRORS
The seteuid() function shall fail if:
EINVAL The value of the uid argument is invalid and is not supported by
the implementation.
EPERM The process does not have appropriate privileges and uid does
not
--
From: Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:49 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r40 - in /httpd/mod_fcgid/trunk/modules/fcgid:
fcgid_bridge.c fcgid_pm_main.c
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:36 AM, p...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pqf
Date
--
From: Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:24 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [mod_fcgid] Feedback / Suggestions
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank ef-li...@email.de wrote:
Hi dev,
I'd like
: pqf
Date: Thu Nov 12 15:05:08 2009
New Revision: 835406
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=835406view=rev
Log:
Add fcgid extension to mod_status
Hi Ryan,
This looks extremely useful. Hopefully I can look at it more over the
next few days. At first glance I think the process
Jeff Trawick wrote:
2009/11/9 pqf p...@mailtech.cn:
Hi, all
I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support to
mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is
it a good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's
Hi,
Yes, mod_fcgid search process node base on file's inode and deviceid(plus
share_group_id, virtual host name). The goal is to create as less process as
possible. Some administrators like the idea that all virtual hosts share one
PHP process pool. (But some other don't, they can turn that
Hi, all
I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support to
mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is it a
good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's not a good idea,
please let me know.
BTW, I did test spin lock on share
Hi, all
I am Ryan Pan, who wrote the first version of mod_fcgid.
While I uesd mod_fastcgi(not mod_fcgid), one issue that bother me is: while a
fastcgi process(created by mod_fastcgi's process manager process)in a dead
loop, no one is respond to kick it out. So from time to time, some
11, 2009 2:15 AM
Subject: Re: Transfer Patch Rights for mod_fcgid ASF
Chris Darroch wrote:
pqf wrote:
Now both authors have subscribe this maillist and claimed to transfer
all rights to the patch
to the Apache Software Foundation, is it OK? Can we move forward now?
Excellent question
Hi,
Thank you Tim Jensen :)
These are the Major patchs which I thought I should ask the patch authors:
Major patches
version 1.10 ( Jul 3rd 2006 )
1. Use poll() instead of select() in UNIX. It becomes problematic on apache2
with large number of logfiles. Apache2 calls poll()
Hi, guys
Good news is I track down another author now. We are talking about the
license questions now, so far so good :)
Thanks
-原始邮件-
发件人: Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.com
发送时间: 2009年1月1日 星期四
收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
抄送:
主题: Re: mod_fcgid license questions
Hi --
On
these patchs can be put to minor patch group too.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: mod_fcgid license questions
pqf wrote:
version 1.10 ( Jul 3rd 2006 )
1. Use poll
Hi, all
Sorry for the delay, I have track down all patches base on my ChangeLog( I
keep my mail archive), so here is my brief:
the Inside job
version 0.76 ( Jul 6th 2004 )
1. Code fix. Replace the depreciated BRIGADE_FOREACH macro, which
pan p...@mailtech.cn
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: mod_fcgid license questions
pqf wrote:
Hi, guys
Nice to meet you :) I hope I can help to clarify the questions.
Likewise :)
When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
from
Hi, guys
Nice to meet you :) I hope I can help to clarify the questions.
When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
from mod_fastcgi?
No. I didn't borrow any code from mod_fastcgi.
Your current intention is for mod_fcgid to be available under
the GPL
28 matches
Mail list logo
