Re: release v1.9.0

No we don't use IPv6 at all. Do you still need those values? Greets, Stefan Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone. > Am 24.02.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > Hi Stefan (Priebe), > > Is IPv6 (really) involved in your network? > > Could you please show up the

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi Stefan (Priebe), Is IPv6 (really) involved in your network? Could you please show up the gdb output of the below ? On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > 1078 APR_DECLARE(int) apr_ipsubnet_test(apr_ipsubnet_t *ipsub, > apr_sockaddr_t *sa) > 1079 { >

Re: release v1.9.0

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Meh. > > Stefan: once during the last 2 days or several? > > > This is accessing r->useragent_addr by mod_access_compat which is, for h2 > slaves, initialized with c->client_addr. > > Since c->client_addr is

Re: release v1.9.0

Meh. Stefan: once during the last 2 days or several? This is accessing r->useragent_addr by mod_access_compat which is, for h2 slaves, initialized with c->client_addr. Since c->client_addr is always initialized by the master connection, I did not see any race issues with sharing this across

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi Yann, Hi Stefan, new trace: Core was generated by `/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -DFOREGROUND'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x7f459699740c in apr_ipsubnet_test (ipsub=0x7f44c003d070, sa=0x7f4570021950) at network_io/unix/sockaddr.c:1090 #0

Re: release v1.9.0

Am 22.02.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Yann Ylavic: > Hi Stefan, > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > wrote: >> >> @Yann how should i test? Vanilla 2.4.25 + MPM V7 + mod_http2 v1.9.1? > > Yes, I think this is the right thing to do for now (no more

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi Stefan, On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > > @Yann how should i test? Vanilla 2.4.25 + MPM V7 + mod_http2 v1.9.1? Yes, I think this is the right thing to do for now (no more patches than v7). > Or > do i need V8 or something else?

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi Stefan, Hi Yann, thanks for v1.9.1 i'm happy to test. @Yann how should i test? Vanilla 2.4.25 + MPM V7 + mod_http2 v1.9.1? Or do i need V8 or something else? Greets, Stefan Am 22.02.2017 um 11:31 schrieb Stefan Eissing: > v1.9.1 is out. Please test at your leisure. > >> Am 21.02.2017 um

Re: release v1.9.0

v1.9.1 is out. Please test at your leisure. > Am 21.02.2017 um 09:40 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > : > > Hi Yann, > > Am 20.02.2017 um 16:38 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >> wrote:

Re: release v1.9.0

Expect a v1.9.1 sometime this week. > Am 21.02.2017 um 09:40 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > : > > Hi Yann, > > Am 20.02.2017 um 16:38 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: release v1.9.0

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > > still no segfaults. Great! > > @Yann > Are those patches (the addon on top of v7) and the one on top of mod_ssl > still correct / needed? I think so, but maybe I'm a bit lost (see below)... > > Am

Re: release v1.9.0

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > I will sleep soundly then. Thanks a lot! :) Thanks to both of you for your persistence! -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: release v1.9.0

> Am 16.02.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > : > > Hi, > > Am 16.02.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Stefan Eissing: >> >>> Am 15.02.2017 um 20:53 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >>> : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> still no segfaults. >> >>

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi, Am 16.02.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Stefan Eissing: > >> Am 15.02.2017 um 20:53 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >> : >> >> Hi, >> >> still no segfaults. > > My heart sings with joy. Can you keep on sending that message every morning? > thanks! I've no time tomorrow

Re: release v1.9.0

> Am 15.02.2017 um 20:53 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > : > > Hi, > > still no segfaults. My heart sings with joy. Can you keep on sending that message every morning? thanks! > > @Yann > Are those patches (the addon on top of v7) and the one on top of mod_ssl

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi, still no segfaults. @Yann Are those patches (the addon on top of v7) and the one on top of mod_ssl still correct / needed? Stefan Am 15.02.2017 um 12:45 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: > Hi, > Am 15.02.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi, Am 15.02.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Yann Ylavic: > Hi Stefan, > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > wrote: >> Current status: no segfaults. > > Is this with or without the mpm_event's wakeup and/or allocator patches? it's with the

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi Stefan, On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Current status: no segfaults. Is this with or without the mpm_event's wakeup and/or allocator patches? Regards, Yann.

Re: release v1.9.0

Also here windows up and running on AL: mod_http2 (v1.9.0-git, feats=, nghttp2 1.19.0), initializing... Steffen On Wednesday 15/02/2017 at 10:17, Stefan Eissing wrote: Thanks. Am 15.02.2017 um 09:34 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG : Current status: no

Re: release v1.9.0

Thanks. > Am 15.02.2017 um 09:34 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > : > > Current status: no segfaults. > >> Am 14.02.2017 um 19:59 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: >> Hi, >> >> up and running - Thanks! >> >> Greets, >> Stefan >> >>> Am 14.02.2017 um 17:05

Re: release v1.9.0

Current status: no segfaults. Am 14.02.2017 um 19:59 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: > Hi, > > up and running - Thanks! > > Greets, > Stefan > > Am 14.02.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing: >> Stefan, >> >> if you'd like, please throw >>

Re: release v1.9.0

Hi, up and running - Thanks! Greets, Stefan Am 14.02.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing: > Stefan, > > if you'd like, please throw > https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/releases/tag/v1.9.0 > into your pit of segfaults and let's see if we find a new one! > > Many thanks for testing. > > Stefan

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2-2.14 RC

On 5 December 2016 at 16:14, Issac Goldstand wrote: > Builds and passes all tests on linux x64 with: > > Perl/5.18 Apache/2.2.31 mod_perl/2.10 > Perl/5.24 Apache/2.4.23 mod_perl/2.10 > > I'm +1 on release All successful on Win32 (x64) / VC10 with: perl-5.25

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2-2.14 RC

Builds and passes all tests on linux x64 with: Perl/5.18 Apache/2.2.31 mod_perl/2.10 Perl/5.24 Apache/2.4.23 mod_perl/2.10 I'm +1 on release On 12/5/2016 5:58 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote: > After (almost) 6 years, the apreq team would like to release version > 2.14 of libapreq. Please

Re: Release date for Apache 2.2.32

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Brian King wrote: > Is there a planned target date for the release of apache 2.2.32? > > Security scanning products (E.g. Rapid7) are recommending upgrading apache > to 2.2.32 because of the July announcement regarding httpoxy: > >

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

+1 on solaris 10 On 16-08-24 01:02 PM, Steve Hay wrote: Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.40 release candidate. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.40-rc1.tar.gz MD5 = ecabfbf3a782601aa1511ae3c89601b0 SHA1 =

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

On 24 August 2016 at 18:02, Steve Hay wrote: > Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.40 > release candidate. > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.40-rc1.tar.gz > +1 on Win8/VC10 with default configuration builds of: Perl

Re: Release annoucements missing on annou...@httpd.apache.org

Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page is up to date... On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Oops. Sorry. On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote: Hi all, since 2.4.10 and 2.2.29 the

Re: Release annoucements missing on annou...@httpd.apache.org

refresh your browser cache. :) On Jul 16, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page is up to date... On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Oops. Sorry. On Jul 15,

Re: Release annoucements missing on annou...@httpd.apache.org

Oops. Sorry. On Jul 15, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote: Hi all, since 2.4.10 and 2.2.29 the annou...@httpd.apache.org is abandoned. Is this intentional? Someone already asked about this last year: http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-devm=141157921203967w=2 If

Re: Release annoucements missing on annou...@httpd.apache.org

I see 2.4.16 since yesterday (if I remember correctly). Are you talking about http://httpd.apache.org/ ? b. On 16 July 2015 at 14:22, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page is up to date... On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47

Re: Release annoucements missing on annou...@httpd.apache.org

Should have thought of that earlier :p @ me. On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: refresh your browser cache. :) On Jul 16, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: Also, the home page still says 2.4.12 and 2.2.29 - but the Download page

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.39 RC1

On 04/13/2015 09:23 AM, Steve Hay wrote: On 8 April 2015 at 18:04, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: On 8 April 2015 at 14:24, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.39 release candidate.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.39 RC1

On 8 April 2015 at 18:04, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: On 8 April 2015 at 14:24, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.39 release candidate. http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/Apache-Test-1.39-rc1.tar.gz

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.39 RC1

On 8 April 2015 at 14:24, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.39 release candidate. http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/Apache-Test-1.39-rc1.tar.gz Success on Windows with VC++ 2010 using perl-5.20.2 with/without LWP and

re: Release Apache httpd 2.2.24 as GA on AIX

packaging was very good. Just a few warning messages about PKG_CONFIG_PATH and openssl. Was discussed earlier in a thread, so it seems harmless. build/aix/buildaix.ksh worked very well with the IBM compiler - AND - apr and apu pre-compiled and installed (so did not use srclib/apr, srclib/apr-util

re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

Packaging went well, but still several compiler syntax warnings. Also, a configure warning - that I hope has no influence: configure: WARNING: Your APR does not include SSL/EVP support. To enable it: configure --with-crypto as I have --enable-ssl in the 2.2.24 configure while 2.4.X is using merely

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

On 19 Feb 2013, at 10:12 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: Packaging went well, but still several compiler syntax warnings. Also, a configure warning - that I hope has no influence: configure: WARNING: Your APR does not include SSL/EVP support. To enable it: configure --with-crypto

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.2.24 as GA on AIX

finally got smart to svn checkuot the right tests (had been blind in one eye and not looking out the other summary of httpd-test: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ---

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

so, it is intended that mod_crypto is not included with --enable-mods-shared=all (and/or --enable-mpms-shared=all)? If so, I shall add --with-crypto to the configure command in the build script. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 19 Feb 2013, at 10:12

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

On 19 Feb 2013, at 1:57 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: so, it is intended that mod_crypto is not included with --enable-mods-shared=all (and/or --enable-mpms-shared=all)? There is no such module as mod_crypto, rather a module called mod_session_crypto. This module uses simple

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

thanks. Will update apr-util and try again. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 19 Feb 2013, at 1:57 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: so, it is intended that mod_crypto is not included with --enable-mods-shared=all (and/or

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

That seems to have cleared that message. Now the test part going difficult. Is the test wrong, or am I missing something with the build? ./configure \ --enable-layout=$LAYOUT \ --with-apr=$apr_config \ --with-apr-util=$apu_config \

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

p.s. this is what I have for mod_auth* ls -l /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 12316 Feb 19 17:17 /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth_basic.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 61826 Feb 19 17:17 /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth_digest.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 39720 Feb 19 17:17

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

authn_default is only used in 2.2, not 2.4/later. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: p.s. this is what I have for mod_auth* ls -l /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 12316 Feb 19 17:17 /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_auth_basic.so -rwxr-xr-x 1

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

On 19.02.2013 18:06, Eric Covener wrote: authn_default is only used in 2.2, not 2.4/later. ... which means: don't simply try to a run a 2.2 config under 2.4. Rainer

Re: Release Apache httpd 2.4.4 as GA - on AIX

Thought I had cleaned it all up. Seems to not be so. Will try again later. Thx! On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote: On 19.02.2013 18:06, Eric Covener wrote: authn_default is only used in 2.2, not 2.4/later. ... which means: don't simply try to a run a

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.38-rc2

+1 OSX 10.7, 5.16, 2.2.21 On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Cosimo Streppone cos...@streppone.it wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:25:51 +0200, Steve Hay steve@verosoftware.com wrote: Fred Moyer wrote on 2012-07-31: RC2 is here, please download, test, and report back.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test 1.38-rc1

Note sure if it is real important, but I cannot get DESTDIR to accept a value, other than manually editting it I epxect. $ DESTDIR=/var/build/ApacheTest perl Makefile.PL -httpd /opt/httpd/sbin/httpd Subroutine MY::test redefined at Makefile.PL line 168. [ info] generating script t/TEST [ info]

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test 1.38-rc1

My result: no idea of how complete it is, or what to do to expand. michael@x104:[/data/prj/Apache-Test-1.38-rc1]perl Makefile.PL -httpd /opt/httpd/sbin/httpd Subroutine MY::test redefined at Makefile.PL line 168. [ info] generating script t/TEST [ info] generating script

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test 1.38-rc1

I can fix it up easily enough if you want to roll an RC2, otherwise I can fix it up after 1.38 is out since this is nothing new. Sure, go ahead and I'll roll RC2. On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Steve Hay steve@verosoftware.com wrote: Fred Moyer wrote on 2012-07-20: Please download,

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.36 RC1

On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 07:54:43 Fred Moyer wrote: http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.36-rc1.tar.gz +1 Torsten Förtsch -- Need professional modperl support? Hire me! (http://foertsch.name) Like fantasy? http://kabatinte.net === Special Tests Sequence Failure Finder

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.36 RC1

2011/2/2 Torsten Förtsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net: On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 07:54:43 Fred Moyer wrote: http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.36-rc1.tar.gz +1 Thanks - nice smoke report :)

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.36 RC1

+1 from me. On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:54 AM, Fred Moyer wrote: http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.36-rc1.tar.gz +1 on OS X and Linux. Last release before mod_perl 2.0.5. Skip sok.t unless perlio is enabled [Torsten Foertsch] Deprecate t/TEST -times=X in favor of t/SMOKE

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.35 RC1

On Thursday, January 20, 2011 17:40:21 Fred Moyer wrote: One more A-T release is needed before we can roll the mod_perl 2.0.5 rc. http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.35-rc1.tar.gz t/alltest/all.t .. skipped: testing all.t t/alltest2/all.t . skipped: testing more than

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.35 RC1

+1 on Linux/5.8.8/2.0.5-dev +1 on Darwin/5.12.2/2.0.5-dev 2011/1/22 Torsten Förtsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net: On Thursday, January 20, 2011 17:40:21 Fred Moyer wrote: One more A-T release is needed before we can roll the mod_perl 2.0.5 rc.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.34 RC1

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote: I had a few issues on Win7 Subroutine MY::test redefined at C:\build\Apache-Test-1.34-rc1\Makefile.PL line 168. t\log_watch.t Use of uninitialized value $fn in unlink at t\log_watch.t line 16. t\log_watch.t

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.34 RC1

+1 On Dec 14, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Fred Moyer wrote: A release candidate for Apache-Test is now available at the following url: http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.34-rc1.tar.gz Please download, test, and report back on this RC. Summary of changes is below. A couple of very old

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.34 RC1

I had a few issues on Win7 Subroutine MY::test redefined at C:\build\Apache-Test-1.34-rc1\Makefile.PL line 168. t\log_watch.t Use of uninitialized value $fn in unlink at t\log_watch.t line 16. t\log_watch.t Dubious, test returned 22 (wstat 5632, 0x1600) Test hang itself

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.34 RC1

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Vincent Veyron vv.li...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Le mercredi 15 décembre 2010 à 07:08 +1100, David Dick a écrit : On 14/12/10 16:11, Fred Moyer wrote:   A release candidate for Apache-Test is now available at the following url:    

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

Confirmed here as well... Good on OSX. On Dec 2, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Sander Temme wrote: On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version 2.13 of libapreq. Good PGP signature; good md5. Built and tested on an

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version 2.13 of libapreq. Good PGP signature; good md5. Built and tested on an x64 Meerkat box, against bundled Apache2. Build against httpd and apr trunk fails: configure

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

Confirmed here as well... Good on OSX. On Dec 2, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Sander Temme wrote: On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version 2.13 of libapreq. Good PGP signature; good md5. Built and tested on an

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

Tested on Ubuntu 9.10 64bit. All test pass ok. Running in live environment for 2 days now without any problems. -- Thomas

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

There are still some build issues surrounding gmake on FreeBSD, but I assume the ports dude knows how to deal with those. +1 for release. - Original Message From: Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net To: apreq-...@httpd.apache.org Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org; mod_perl Dev

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

Examples, I'll have to hunt for, and maybe someone on-list will be able to give a good place to start. Docs you can find at http://httpd.apache.org/apreq/docs/libapreq2/index.html On 25/11/2010 21:43, pierre laplante wrote: Is there any documentation or examples on how to used apreq from a C

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

builds and all tests pass on linux w/ 2.2.11 w/ perl 5.8.8 i'll give it a spin on solaris sparc and x86 tomorrow. Adam On 11/25/2010 2:34 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version 2.13 of

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.33 RC1

RC2 is available which contains an additional feature: Propagate APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES to the Apache environment for mod_perl configurations (Apache::TestConfigPerl), http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/101929 [Torsten Foertsch] Please download and test this release

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.33 RC1

On Saturday, September 11, 2010 08:38:46 Fred Moyer wrote: http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.33-rc2.tar.gz +1 opensuse 11.3 self-compiled perl 5.12.1 x86_64, useithreads=undef, usemultiplicity=undef apache Server version: Apache/2.2.16 (Unix) Server built: Sep 9 2010 15:10:55

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.33 RC1

On 9/11/2010 4:32 PM, Torsten Förtsch wrote: On Saturday, September 11, 2010 08:38:46 Fred Moyer wrote: http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.33-rc2.tar.gz +1 Debian Lenny (5.0.6) Server version: Apache/2.2.14 (Unix) Server built: May 23 2010 23:00:52 Summary of my perl5 (revision

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.33 RC1

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net wrote:  On 9/11/2010 4:32 PM, Torsten Förtsch wrote: On Saturday, September 11, 2010 08:38:46 Fred Moyer wrote:  http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Test-1.33-rc2.tar.gz +1 Debian Lenny (5.0.6) +1 Linux 2.6.23.17,

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.31 RC3

On 2010-02-12, at 11:13 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: Third release candidate, a couple of small fixes from Gozer. So far we've got positive results across the board. Please take this for a spin if you haven't tried one of the previous release candidates.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.31 RC2

I'll take that as a +1? :) +1 from me, so that makes 2. Would like to get at least two more +1s from mod_perl devs. Thanks to everyone else who has taken a few minutes to test out this version. On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Adam Prime adam.pr...@utoronto.ca wrote: Passes all tests on 2.2.10

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

Joe Schaefer wrote: Please test and vote on http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz.asc These should have the .deps directories removed, but otherwise the source is unchanged. Fred, try running make install before

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 10:34 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 15:25 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote: Is that a +1 to release, or not yet? I'll try to build some RPMs from it first and report back. +1.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC1

Hi Joe, I think that I discussed the following issue with Issac, two years ago. Actually, the idea to have an interactive fallback for CGI, was mine, I was the sponsor, and Issac programmed it (very well!). Before getting any decision, I want to discuss it again with him, which can't be done

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC1

- Original Message From: Eli Marmor mar...@netmask.it To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 10:12:44 AM Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC1 Hi Joe, I think that I discussed the following issue with Issac, two years ago. Actually, the idea

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

- Original Message From: Fred Moyer f...@redhotpenguin.com To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 4:23:11 PM Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2 On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:35 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote: Please test and vote on http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC2.tar.gz.asc Compiles and runs all tests successfully on F-10. -- Bojan

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message t/apreq/cgi# writing file: /Users/phred/dev/svn/sl/trunk/SL-App/src/libapreq2-2.12/glue/perl/t/cgi-bin/test_cgi.pl My guess is that this write failed. Wonder why, permissions maybe? No cgi-bin dir on my system in glue/perl/t. Permissions

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

Is that a +1 to release, or not yet? - Original Message From: Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 6:15:16 PM Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2 On Fri, 2009-03-06

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC2

On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 10:34 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 15:25 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote: Is that a +1 to release, or not yet? I'll try to build some RPMs from it first and report back. +1. Builds OK as RPM on F-10 and F-11. -- Bojan

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC1

- Original Message From: Fred Moyer f...@silverliningnetworks.com To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: apreq-...@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 12:10:15 PM Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC1 Joe Schaefer wrote: Please test and vote

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.12 RC1

Joe Schaefer wrote: Please test and vote on the following tarball and sigfile: http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC1.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.12-RC1.tar.gz.asc I've seeded the dates to be 1 week from today, so let's not dilly-dally please ;-) Getting an

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 08:47 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: I'm all for calling 2.11 a dud and restarting with 2.12 Version numbers are cheap - go for it. -- Bojan

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Steve Hay wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. creating mod_apreq2.la (cd .libs rm -f mod_apreq2.la ln -s ../mod_apreq2.la mod_apreq2.la) make:

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. creating mod_apreq2.la (cd .libs rm -f mod_apreq2.la ln -s

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Randy Kobes wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet? I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet? I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet: http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2 This is

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Bojan Smojver wrote: On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 04:03 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Does the perl glue not being built / installed correctly on CentOS count ? [I had spoken too soon before when I was all excited] If there is a problem with libapreq2 RPMS on CentOS, let me know what the fix is.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 14:53 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: I built from SVN or do you mean you'll add a patch to the rpm after release ? I thought you were referring to current RPM build/install there. If there is a problem with build/install on CentOS from source and we know how to fix

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 13:53 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote: That is bunk. We shoul NEVER try to support svn builds for releases, because that makes us dependent on whatever autocruft is on CentOS. It also doesn't help diddly squat when testing a potential candidate for release, since those are

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Issac Issac Goldstand wrote: The apreq developers are planning a maintenance release of libapreq2. This version addresses several bugfixes and includes new features. Changes since the last release

RE: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet? I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet: http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Issac Goldstand wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet? I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet:

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

On Wed 28 Jan 2009, Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. If it matters, I have successfully run all tests on my mod_perl installation (threading branch) with apache 2.2.11 both with worker and prefork on Suse linux

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Torsten Foertsch wrote: On Wed 28 Jan 2009, Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. If it matters, I have successfully run all tests on my mod_perl installation (threading branch) with apache 2.2.11 both with worker and

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

Steve Hay wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. We're still a +1 short of release. Has anyone else tested on Win32 yet? I reported a build error which hasn't been addressed yet: http://marc.info/?l=apreq-devm=123244555902865w=2 I must've

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:50 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: I don't get any fails by me... Can you try make test-ing apreq2-2.08 and see if you get the same fails so we know if it's a regression? Will do. -- Bojan

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11

builds and tests ok on gentoo linux w/ apache 2.2.8, mod_perl 2.0.4

<    1   2   3   4   5   >