On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 05:47 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
What's the MD5 supposed to be?
Sorry. I'm getting here:
3b8b52c261c72adc971b656ca77f6eab libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 13:27 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
3b8b52c261c72adc971b656ca77f6eab libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/pgollucci/public_html/apreq2 rv=0 52 md5
libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz
MD5 (libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz) =
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 13:41 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Works fine, I just untarred it here:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq/libapreq2-2.08
OK. I'm off to work now anyway - I'll try unpacking on machines there.
--
Bojan
Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK. I'm off to work now anyway - I'll try unpacking on machines there.
Works on Solaris Sparc and RHEL4 x86_64, doesn't on Fedora Core 5
x86_64/i386. Go figure...
--
Bojan
Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Works on Solaris Sparc and RHEL4 x86_64, doesn't on Fedora Core 5
x86_64/i386. Go figure...
New FC bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198305
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK. I'm off to work now anyway - I'll try unpacking on machines there.
Works on Solaris Sparc and RHEL4 x86_64, doesn't on Fedora Core 5
x86_64/i386. Go figure...
Its not I did something differnt from previous releases
Quoting Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Should I roll another one or do you think its just that box ?
You can if you want, but the file as it is may be just fine. RHEL4 and
Solaris 9 don't have any problems with the file. I'm guessing Apache
boxes are FreeBSD and that works too.
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and VOTE on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz
[ .. ]
I'd like to make the actual release around Wednesday of next week (07/12/2006)
I'm away next week
Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://libapreq2.p6m7g8.net/
I _believe_ all the links _finally_ work now.
Once 2.08 is official, this site will dissappear, and you should
continue using the real apache site.
Please let me know if you see anything out of place.
Nice job!
--
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC1.tar.gz
Does this compile with Apache/2.2 on unix? I've been
working on 2.2 support for Win32, but will need
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC1.tar.gz
Does this compile with Apache/2.2 on unix? I've been
working on 2.2 support for
Forwarding back to the list.
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357
Quoting Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
Builds as RPM on Fedora Core 5 on my x86_64 box. I'll try the same in
Fedora Extras development tree as well. The spec file required some
changes in order to build. I'm
Mark Galbreath wrote:
I'm drawing a blank
for those following only dev@httpd.apache.org, and thus may be unaware of
what Apache-Test is, here's the deal...
Apache-Test
http://perl.apache.org/Apache-Test/
is the engine that drives the perl-framework
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change to make rolling release
candidates slightly easier.
Instead of removing the -dev in ./Changes, we could change it to rc1,
rc2, etc.
The version would then be 'mod_perl-2.0.x-rcn' and the tarball would be
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
+1
FreeBSD 7.0-current
perl 5.8.7 w/o ithreads
httpd 2.0.55 apr not threaded
Again, I've got a +1 from Randy. Two more and I'll release
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-RC2.tar.gz
Please take the time to exercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I've noticed we include the RELEASE file in the release tarball. I
don't believe mod_perl or apreq do. Is this intentional ?
Appologies, this was not correct. Too many directories of this thing.
--
END
måndag 03 oktober 2005 18.35 skrev Paul Querna:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi.
I don't know if this is the right forum for this question but I found no
info elsewhere. I simply wonder when 2.1.x is going to be dubbed stable?
See our versioning file:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
A release candidate for Apache-Test 1.27 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/at/Apache-Test-1.27-dev.tar.gz
I've noticed we include the RELEASE file in the release tarball. I don't believe mod_perl or apreq do. Is this
intentional ?
--
END
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi.
I don't know if this is the right forum for this question but I found no info
elsewhere. I simply wonder when 2.1.x is going to be dubbed stable?
See our versioning file:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/VERSIONING
2.1.x will never be 'stable'.
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
I had to double escape the r, ie \\\release to make it work. Grisha, did
you generate the docs on BSD before, and if so is the BSD sed different?
Yes, it was always done on FreeBSD before - it is quite likely that the
sed is different More likely
Hi Grisha,
What do you want for the win32 version ? I regularly rebuild the win32
installer from the latest Subversion revision and put it there :
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python . Using this installer,
people can test and give their +1 / -1. Is that OK for you ?
Regards,
Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.21 is now available.
http://cvs.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.21-dev.tar.gz
I'm unable to download. I've tried at work and at home without success.
I just get a connection timeout error.
C:\Documents and Settings\claconslookup
On Mar 21, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.21 is now available.
http://cvs.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.21-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your
existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back
Yes, a new module directory called debug was added as a
subdirectory of modules. This conflicted with the debug output
directory that was being created during the build process. The result
was that everytime you did a gmake -f NWGNUMakefile clean it wiped out
the source code found in the new
Brad Nicholes wrote:
Yes, a new module directory called debug was added as a
subdirectory of modules. This conflicted with the debug output
directory that was being created during the build process. The result
was that everytime you did a gmake -f NWGNUMakefile clean it wiped out
the source
At 04:15 PM 12/17/2004, you wrote:
Yes, a new module directory called debug was added as a
subdirectory of modules. This conflicted with the debug output
directory that was being created during the build process.
That's a pretty big stick, and Win32 suffers similar issues.
Can't we simply
On Nov 8, 2004, at 8:23 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.16 is now available.
All tests pass for me, both in Apache::Test and in my module that uses
it.
Regards,
David
On Oct 11, 2004, at 6:36 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.14 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.14-dev.tar.gz
All tests pass for me, and my module that uses Apache::TestMB continues
to work nicely with this version installed.
Thanks,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Heh, it's so much easier when you have a reproducable case to work on.
Believe me, I know; I ask my clients for reproducible cases all the
time. I'm starting to learn some tricks for tracking down problems like
this one. Hopefully my
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:20:39PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
OK, I have a reproducible set of tests which work the same on Win* and
Linux. The problem has to do with bringing CGI::Carp into play. Here are
two additional tests--one works and the other fails. I hope this will
help you to resolve
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:56:05PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
So all the problems you have reported before are now resolved, William?
I knew you were going to ask me that g! It's not necessarily the case.
I did not do a complete test under Windows using my test suite; I just
ran the basic
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:56:05PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
So all the problems you have reported before are now resolved, William?
I knew you were going to ask me that g! It's not necessarily the case.
I did not do a complete test under Windows using my test suite; I just
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Well, I tried to fix it some time ago, but w/o being able to reproduce it
I wasn't very successful. If you have ideas to what could be the problem,
please let us know/send a patch.
I find it interesting that the default testsuite
On Aug 19, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
You can download the release candidate from here:
http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.13-dev.tar.gz
All tests pass for me, and it appears to work nicely with my module
that uses Apache::TestMB.
Regards,
David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:17:37PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
You can download the release candidate from here:
http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.13-dev.tar.gz
If there are no problems reported Apache-Test 1.13 will be
released tomorrow.
It's working fine for me under both Linux and
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:17:37PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
You can download the release candidate from here:
http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.13-dev.tar.gz
If there are no problems reported Apache-Test 1.13 will be
released tomorrow.
It's working fine for me under
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:08:33AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
It's working fine for me under both Linux and Windows.
Thanks!
So all the problems you have reported before are now resolved, William?
I knew you were going to ask me that g! It's not necessarily the case.
I did not
Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.13 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.13-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
All tests
OK, please let us know when and if you see it again.
I see that there were quite a few changes since the last A-T release,
any volunteers to wear the Release Manager cap and get a new version out?
I'll do it, once the need_* functions have been implemented (which I'll do
as well :)
--Geoff
Geoffrey Young wrote:
OK, please let us know when and if you see it again.
I see that there were quite a few changes since the last A-T release,
any volunteers to wear the Release Manager cap and get a new version out?
I'll do it, once the need_* functions have been implemented (which I'll do
as
William McKee wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm not sure, but you could run both with tracing on -trace=debug or
APACHE_TEST_TRACE_LEVEL=debug and then compare the logs. Could be that in
one case it finds a global httpd.conf but not in the other?
Hi Stas,
On Jun 27, 2004, at 1:21 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Ah, right, too many flags to remember :) it's easier when all patches
are in the same format :)
Yeah, -p is the only one I actually know, since I often get patches
generated from
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 25, 2004, at 4:49 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Hrm, nope. I just installed the latest on another box and the
redirection still works properly. Odd...
So let's introduce some tests to see where it happens, hrm??
Thanks, committed. David, in the future please create patches
On Jun 28, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks, committed. David, in the future please create patches with
'cvs diff' so that they can be applied easily, thanks :)
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Regards,
David
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 28, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks, committed. David, in the future please create patches with
'cvs diff' so that they can be applied easily, thanks :)
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Ah, right, too many flags to
On Jun 25, 2004, at 4:49 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Hrm, nope. I just installed the latest on another box and the
redirection still works properly. Odd...
So let's introduce some tests to see where it happens, hrm??
diff -Naur old/t/conf/extra.conf.in new/t/conf/extra.conf.in
---
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:35:39PM -0400, William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:30:29AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
Commenting out lines 669 and 1696 make it work fine. I remember having
this discussion a few months back but did not find a solution.
Apparently it is still an issue.
Yup, but it was an issue with previous A-T releases as well, so it's not
a showstopper. Someone who can reproduce this
On Jun 25, 2004, at 8:23 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
nope. I think apache.org has been having email issues - my announce
came 3
hours later, and a bunch of messages were duplicated. or maybe it was
just me.
No, I'm on the road and just found out that the network I'm on has
sendmail stuff locked
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 25, 2004, at 8:31 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
blarg. a revised candidate is in the same place. sorry about that.
Thanks, I'll try it later today.
Works great for me! Only issue I'm seeing is that
Crequests_redirectable = 0 isn't working on one of my
On Jun 25, 2004, at 12:02 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
check the version of lwp - IIRC there was a behavior change in recent
versions.
You could be right. I have the latest, 5.79, on that box, and 5.76 on
my other boxes. Seems like it might make sense to fix that before
releasing 1.12. I'll look
On Jun 25, 2004, at 1:49 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
You could be right. I have the latest, 5.79, on that box, and 5.76 on
my other boxes. Seems like it might make sense to fix that before
releasing 1.12. I'll look at it later today if you don't beat me to
it. It'll be tomorrow at the soonest I
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:30:29AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
Looks good for me.
William
--
Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:35:39PM -0400, William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:30:29AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
Looks good for
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm not sure, but you could run both with tracing on -trace=debug or
APACHE_TEST_TRACE_LEVEL=debug and then compare the logs. Could be that in
one case it finds a global httpd.conf but not in the other?
Hi Stas,
Finally getting
Thanks for the info Stas and Joe. I will try rebuilding with Joe's
suggestion. However, I'm curious why things work just fine when I run
the tests and pass in the path to httpd. For example:
t/TEST -httpd /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd
William
--
Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com
William McKee wrote:
Thanks for the info Stas and Joe. I will try rebuilding with Joe's
suggestion. However, I'm curious why things work just fine when I run
the tests and pass in the path to httpd. For example:
t/TEST -httpd /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd
I'm not sure, but you could run both
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:19:10PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Yes, it exists and is executable. I wonder if there is a permissions
problem That appears to be a problem. If I try to run it as a normal
user (which is how I was testing), I get the following error:
Ouch!
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:58:36AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, it was due to my recent change to remove the use of
revision 2 as a default.
I was able to reproduce it. Now fixed in cvs. Please confirm that it works
for you.
Hi Stas,
Actually I just pulled it out of CVS and am
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:58:36AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, it was due to my recent change to remove the use of
revision 2 as a default.
I was able to reproduce it. Now fixed in cvs. Please confirm that it works
for you.
Hi Stas,
Actually I just pulled it
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:00:36PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Make sure you don't have APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES env var turned
on. That's exactly the problem I've raised in the other thread.
Yeah, I read some of that thread though didn't follow the exact details.
In any case, the only
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:00:36PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Make sure you don't have APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES env var turned
on. That's exactly the problem I've raised in the other thread.
Yeah, I read some of that thread though didn't follow the exact details.
In
Please show us the verbose trace:
t/TEST -trace=debug
including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
brought you back to interactive config again.
ok, the plan was to roll an official release this afternoon (as in now).
what's the feeling on this? release as is
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Please show us the verbose trace:
t/TEST -trace=debug
including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
brought you back to interactive config again.
ok, the plan was to roll an official release this afternoon (as in now).
what's the feeling on this?
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:29:33PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Please show us the verbose trace:
t/TEST -trace=debug
including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
brought you back to interactive config again.
Got the latest version from CVS again and this time
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:29:33PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Please show us the verbose trace:
t/TEST -trace=debug
including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
brought you back to interactive config again.
Got the latest version from CVS again and
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, what do you have inside:
/home/william/.apache-test/Apache/TestConfigData.pm
package Apache::TestConfigData;
use strict;
use warnings;
$Apache::TestConfigData::vars = {
'httpd' = '/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd',
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, what do you have inside:
/home/william/.apache-test/Apache/TestConfigData.pm
[...]
$Apache::TestConfigData::vars = {
'httpd' = '/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd',
So does this file exist and
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:43:49PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
So does this file exist and executable? /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd? any
symlinks involved? I fail to reproduce it on my machine.
Yes, it exists and is executable. I wonder if there is a permissions
problem That appears to be a
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:43:49PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
So does this file exist and executable? /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd? any
symlinks involved? I fail to reproduce it on my machine.
Yes, it exists and is executable. I wonder if there is a permissions
problem
blargh - cut and paste error. the subject should read Apache-Test-1.11.
--Geoff
On May 19, 2004, at 9:02 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.11 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.11-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your
existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
I had errors during testing which appear to be due to problems with the
auto configuration. Here's the steps I used:
perl Makefile.PL
make
On Apr 16, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
A few problems were noticed and fixed, thanks to Ken Coar. So here is
a new RC. Same URL:
All tests still pass for me, including in my module.
Regards,
David
On Apr 16, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
A few problems were noticed and fixed, thanks to Ken Coar. So here is
a new RC. Same URL:
All tests still pass for me, including in my module.
Regards,
David
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info:
On Apr 15, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Unless someone reports problems, I'm going to release a new version of
Apache-Test tomorrow. Please test this release candidate:
http://perl.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.10-dev.tar.gz
All tests pass for me, and my module that uses it still
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
In the interim, it would be nice to see some mention of a workaround on
the site for users.
Done. Let me know if you think that there are more details I could add
that would be helpful.
--Cliff
You guys are great!
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:54:05AM -0500, Robert La Ferla wrote:
I have no problem with running release candidates and contributing. I
have contributed in the past by the way... In fact, I wouldn't object
to trying nightly or weekly builds. The problem is that I don't see
those as easily
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 10:13:09PM -0500, Robert La Ferla wrote:
What testing gets performed prior to an official httpd 2.x release? I
think whatever test suite is used, needs some updating to include
configurations that utilize more features like user tracking, caching
and multi-views.
-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 10:23 PM
To: Robert La Ferla
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Release Frequency and Testing
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
What testing gets performed prior to an official httpd 2.x release? I
Manni Wood wrote:
Yeah, I have to take responsibility for this bug. Apologies to all. Fans
of irony will appreciate that I unwittingly introduced this new bug
while solving a long-standing cookie header parsing bug! Ouch...
May be it's a good time to remove the cookie handling from the core and
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
What testing gets performed prior to an official httpd 2.x release? I
think whatever test suite is used, needs some updating to include
configurations that utilize more features like user tracking, caching
and multi-views. The last release
I hope the response does not diminish your enthusiasm...
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (you can join up with a mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) maintains the mod_specweb and
the perl-framework websites. I believe that flood is seperate at this point.
Please - subscribe and contribute! The
I have no problem with running release candidates and contributing. I
have contributed in the past by the way... In fact, I wouldn't object
to trying nightly or weekly builds. The problem is that I don't see
those as easily available from the httpd.apache.org website. There is a
link to
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
link to the latest source tree but the source code there does not have a
configure script. Yes, I can build the script (autoconf?) but if you
want people to test software on a regular basis, it would be better to
have a ready to go source release
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
In the interim, it would be nice to see some mention of a workaround on
the site for users.
Done. Let me know if you think that there are more details I could add
that would be helpful.
--Cliff
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 01:07 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.06 is now available. 1.06 is
the version of Apache-Test that will ship with mod_perl 1.99_11.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.06-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the
David Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 01:07 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.06 is now available. 1.06 is
the version of Apache-Test that will ship with mod_perl 1.99_11.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.06-dev.tar.gz
please take the
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Can you please test with the current cvs, should be fixed now.
Confirmed, thanks!
I don't think we have changed anything, besides the patches you've
submitted by yourself ;) There is no patch attachment, btw.
That's because the mail
David Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Can you please test with the current cvs, should be fixed now.
Confirmed, thanks!
Thanks for testing, David.
I don't think we have changed anything, besides the patches you've
submitted by yourself ;) There is no
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
We just try to walk the thin rope of balance and use our common sense
to decide what should be noted and what note, often times noting to
each other when we think that some change log is due or on the
opposite useless.
Works for
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 12:48 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.05 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.05-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your
existing applications that use Apache-Test
David Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 12:48 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.05 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.05-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your
existing applications
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 02:17 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
do you mean this?
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-
Test/lib/Apache/TestRequest.pm.diff?r1=1.87r2=1.88
Yes.
this was added after 1.04.
I guess we are inconsistent in logging doc changes in
I guess we are inconsistent in logging doc changes in Changes.
personally, I think the Changes file is most useful if it logs only
functionality changes. but there are other documentation issues
mentioned there currently, so if you'd like I'll insert that into
Changes in (around) the
Geoffrey Young wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
[...]
I think that this release contains my fixes to the TestRequest::POST
documentation, too. Or was that in 1.04?
do you mean this?
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestRequest.pm.diff?r1=1.87r2=1.88
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all
in preparation for the upcoming 1.05 release, I'm going to create a
RELEASE document in the Apache-Test directory. I've attached a
preliminary version here, which is essentially copied from the one for
mod_perl (with a few adjustments).
if I'm missing anything or
301 - 400 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
