4. Release the package and update links (e.g. mod_perl-1.99_11.tar.gz)
a. upload to www.apache.org:/www/perl.apache.org/dist/
b. remove releases older by 2 subversions (keep the last one)
we don't release Apache-Test on apache.org, but only CPAN. So you can
drop 4.
Geoffrey Young wrote:
4. Release the package and update links (e.g. mod_perl-1.99_11.tar.gz)
a. upload to www.apache.org:/www/perl.apache.org/dist/
b. remove releases older by 2 subversions (keep the last one)
we don't release Apache-Test on apache.org, but only CPAN. So you can
drop 4.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
In anticipation of a very soon TR of 1.3.28, please try
out HEAD. All expected patches have been folded in.
Quick spin on Windows looks good. +1 on release.
Bill
:
Subject: Re: Release of 1.3.28 RSN
07/16/2003 08:42
AM
Rob Bloodgood wrote:
Tuesday, June 24, 2003, 1:51:51 PM, you wrote:
JS Rob Bloodgood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JS [...]
*** root mode: changing the fs ownership to 'nobody' (99:99)
/usr/sbin/httpd -X -d /root/.cpan/build/Apache-Test-1.03/t -f
/root/.cpan/build/Apache-Test-1.03/t/conf/httpd
JS
Jim Jagielski wrote:
In anticipation of a very soon TR of 1.3.28, please try
out HEAD. All expected patches have been folded in.
+1 for release
ERROR:
There is no such list DATE here.
SOLUTION:
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject
of 'info' (no quotes) for a list of available mailing lists.
--
Sincerely, the Minimalist
Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 2:13:46 AM, you wrote:
SB I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll
SB upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes to
release
SB its 1.2's version).
SB Please try it out:
SB
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 05:13 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults,
I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes
to release its 1.2's version).
Please try it out:
Hi Stas,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Please try it out:
http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz
Neat!
73,
Ged.
Script started on Wed Jun 18 13:29:03 2003
hurricane:~/src/Apache-Test-1.03-dev$ t/TEST -times=10 -order=random
*** setting ulimit to allow core files
Stas Bekman wrote:
I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll
upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes to
release its 1.2's version).
Please try it out:
http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz
Thank you all very much for
Hi,
you suggested this already more than a month ago, but nothing happened then...
I would also like to see such an alpha-release...
Guenter.
Is anyone interested in seeing a release from the dev branch? I suspect
there are some users out there who would like to get their hands dirty,
and
--On Friday, June 20, 2003 2:11 AM +0200 Günter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you suggested this already more than a month ago, but nothing happened
then... I would also like to see such an alpha-release...
Once mod_ssl works again, I'd support doing a 2.1 release.
I think that'll require me
Stas Bekman wrote:
I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults,
I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes
to release its 1.2's version).
Please try it out:
http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz
Tests OK for me - Windows XP /
Hi,
5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD, apache 1.3.27, mod_perl 1.27, perl 5.8.0
All tests successful.
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: modperl@perl.apache.org,httpd-test-dev list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:13:46 +1000
Subject: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 05:13 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults,
I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes
to release its 1.2's version).
Please try it out:
Hi,
5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD, apache 1.3.27, mod_perl 1.27, perl 5.8.0
All tests successful.
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],httpd-test-dev list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:13:46 +1000
Subject: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test
Not acked.
- Forwarded message from Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Release the win32 binaries as a zip file?
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 13:04:08 +0200
Then I can extract it, put it where I want it and install the service? This
is under
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
Personally, I'm finding that it seems we're getting back to the old, slow
it takes a lot of pain to make a release process. Rather than a nice,
easy, snap and release. Remember: even though we're GA, we can still snap
new releases, test them, and *then*
Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The other is a sendfile assert that we've seen intermittently for a long time.
Jeff thinks the FreeBSD kernel is giving us a return value of 0 with no bytes
sent. I think we might be passing a length or an offset that's too big, perhaps
when the site is
Sander Striker wrote:
If your commit solved the prob, the worker restart issue is
the remaining holdup for 2.0.36. I'll tag by the end of the day.
Crossing fingers...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL
Hi,
I volunteer to be RM for 2.0.36 (that is, if noone
has a problem with that ;).
I'm aware of the issues we still have in HEAD, which
is why we need a tag and run that on daedalus.
However, I'll hold of on the tag since there are
probably going to be some file moves in the atomics
section.
+1
Hi,
I volunteer to be RM for 2.0.36 (that is, if noone
has a problem with that ;).
I'm aware of the issues we still have in HEAD, which
is why we need a tag and run that on daedalus.
However, I'll hold of on the tag since there are
probably going to be some file moves in the
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 02:00:25PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I volunteer to be RM for 2.0.36 (that is, if noone
has a problem with that ;).
I'm aware of the issues we still have in HEAD, which
is why we need a tag and run that on daedalus.
However, I'll hold of on the tag since
You know, I don't see this but I wonder if the reason why is because
on those systems where it fails, /usr/ccs/bin isn't in their path...
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The reason I suggested a hold to Sander on account of the atomics
is that we have a bunch of PRs relating to building atomics on
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The reason I suggested a hold to Sander on account of the atomics
is that we have a bunch of PRs relating to building atomics on
Solaris that haven't been (yet) resolved.
Hold on a tic... I think I see it... On the systems that fail,
I bet they are using GNUas. If
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:33:54AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
...
If I can get that semantics change done on optional fns/hooks so we can
avoid all mmn version bumps for optional fn/hooks, I think that would also
cut down on the bumps for foreign modules. Will look to make some
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 16:44
What is the current status on 2.0.36-dev?
Big things that I know of besides what's in bugzilla:
1) The MMAP bucket cleanup problem, which has been responsible for
some (rare-ish) segv's on daedalus [I think I
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 16:44
What is the current status on 2.0.36-dev?
Saw the fixes, so this is gone.
2) The worker shutdown segfault ... Jeff, does the patch you committed
fix this for
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Trawick
Sent: 22 April 2002 16:33
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 16:44
What is the current status on 2.0.36-dev?
Saw the fixes,
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Sander Striker wrote:
- allocate the sockets out of a special pool so we can clean up the
sockets (using apr_pool_clear(psock)), sleep for 1 sec (should be enough
for all threads to notice the sockets are gone). After that clean
pchild as usual.
From my uninformed
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Sander Striker wrote:
What is the current status on 2.0.36-dev?
Big things that I know of besides what's in bugzilla:
1) The MMAP bucket cleanup problem, which has been responsible for
some (rare-ish) segv's on daedalus [I think I figured out
how to fix this last
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
What is the current status on 2.0.36-dev?
Big things that I know of besides what's in bugzilla:
1) The MMAP bucket cleanup problem, which has been responsible for
some (rare-ish) segv's on daedalus [I think I figured out
how to fix this
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Sander Striker wrote:
What is the current status on 2.0.36-dev?
Big things that I know of besides what's in bugzilla:
1) The MMAP bucket cleanup problem, which has been responsible for
some (rare-ish) segv's on daedalus
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
5) What about the libtool --install issue and Sander's partial
patch for it?
I'll try to get this done by tomorrow afternoon. Besides the coding,
it needs to be tested out on some platforms which Sander doesn't have
access to.
--
Jeff Trawick
401 - 435 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
