Whatever exists in the tarball is not really an issue, since CHANGES is never really intended to be canon anyway.
However, if we are concerned about confusion, I would suggest that we change the CHANGES_2.4 and CHANGES_2.4.12 files which are more visible. > On Jan 28, 2015, at 6:10 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >> There was an issue with 2.4.11 and in 2.4.12 there is nothing mentioned in >> the change file what is reverted. There must be in 2.4.11 a change which was >> causing a issue, and the changes from 2.4.11 are included. So the CHANGES >> is not accurate. >> >> >> Revert changes are mentioned formerly see for example with 2.4.6 : >> *) Revert a broken fix for PR54948 that was applied to 2.4.5 (which was >> not released) and found post-2.4.5 tagging. > > I think either arrangement is okay.
