William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
All this shows that running UDP in Apache can make sense, and I tried
to get some attention about it one year ago.. But somehow everybody
thought that UDP inside Apache can be used only for HTTP-over-UDP,
which is indeed controversial.. I hope that full UDP-support will
Ian,
I would like to commit your UDP listener patch to apache 2.1's source tree.
(providing other people don't have any major objections)
Of course.. I would need your permission to do this first.
for those of you who are interested in doing weird things in Apache,
I would like to
Ian Holsman wrote:
I would like to commit your UDP listener patch to apache 2.1's source tree.
(providing other people don't have any major objections)
I'm at a loss as to what the big picture is with the programming model
enabled by this path. I could go read the whole DNS+HTTP redirection
Jeff,
Yes, I do realize that it is not obvious how it works, especially without
reading the papers :-) I will try to clear it up a bit.. but you will need
the source code of NetAirt, as I am going to refer to it below.
(http://www.globule.org/netairt/netairt-2.0.46-0.2-thin.tgz)
I'm at a loss
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Let me offer one thought here. I'm -0 on including this patch in Apache for
one very simple reason. We are a standards-based server. Yes, UDP is
a clear standard, as is HTTP. But in order to incorporate your patch, I would
want to see nothing less than a draft RFC
Very interesting Michal.
I would like to commit your UDP listener patch to apache 2.1's source tree.
(providing other people don't have any major objections)
Of course.. I would need your permission to do this first.
Regards
Ian
Michal Szymaniak wrote:
Hello,
for those of you who are
