RE: fate of mod_lbmethod_rr (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA)

+1 for removing from 2.4.x. Regards Rüdiger From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] Sent: Mittwoch, 23. März 2016 02:16 To: httpd Subject: Re: fate of mod_lbmethod_rr (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Trawick <t

Re: fate of mod_lbmethod_rr (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA)

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr

Re: fate of mod_lbmethod_rr (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA)

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr >> wrote: >> >>> Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? >> > > That's funny actually. The very first version README.cmake in trunk says > that

fate of mod_lbmethod_rr (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA)

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? >> > > That's funny actually. The very first version README.cmake in trunk says > that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Done in r1736250 (and merged in r1736251). On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Hmm, I thought we had that fixed by adding the proper compiler flags in > maintainer mode. Will fix tomorrow morning. > > Stefan > >> Am 22.03.2016 um 20:59 schrieb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? > That's funny actually. The very first version README.cmake in trunk says that mod_lbmethod_rr.c doesn't build on Windows, yet the only build support I can find for that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Hmm, I thought we had that fixed by adding the proper compiler flags in maintainer mode. Will fix tomorrow morning. Stefan > Am 22.03.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Eric Covener : > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:57 PM, William A Rowe Jr >> wrote: >> Finally,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? > I guess I'll try soon with cmake on Windows, once prereqs are built and I add a line or two to CMakeLists.txt for that module :) (I'm backpedaling to trunk from 2.4.19

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Am 22.03.2016 um 20:59 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: Am 22.03.2016 um 20:55 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? my Fedora 23

VOTE RECALLED: (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA)

Due to the Window's build issue, I am recalling this vote. With http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1736157, it looks like this issue is resolved. Will give it until 8am (Eastern) tomorrow and will kick off 2.4.20 T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:57 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Finally, just confirming we have decided that C99 is now the minimum > supported compiler feature set- used for the vardic macros in h2_filter.c? I don't think that is meant to be bumped. We definitely had simpler

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 22.03.2016 um 20:55 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: > >> Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? >> > > my Fedora 23 rpm-spec builds without any issue or change - most modules > external sub-apckages and typically

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Am 22.03.2016 um 20:55 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? my Fedora 23 rpm-spec builds without any issue or change - most modules external sub-apckages and typically used ones static [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ /bin/ls -1 /fileserver/yum-repo/fc23/x86_64/ |

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Finally, just confirming we have decided that C99 is now the minimum supported compiler feature set- used for the vardic macros in h2_filter.c? On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found > at the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Can anyone get mod_lbmethod_rr.c to build? I'm seeing 'name' : is not a member of 'proxy_balancer' errors, as well as ap_proxy_retry_worker() undefined (converted into an optional function, perhaps?) On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Note that mod_socache_shmcb.c introduced UINT_MAX without including limits.h... whoops. Investigating. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found > at the usual place: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:38:31 +0100): >I added the missing line in trunk and 2.4.x. Jan, are you able >to verify that the current 2.4.x builds for you? Thanks! I did not check the current build, but added the line myself and went ahead:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

While we're not an official voter, I did want to advise we’ve tested this release on our platform and saw no problems with our high level tests. > [X ] +1: Good to go Tested on CentOS 6 x86_64. — Jacob Perkins Product Owner cPanel Inc. jacob.perk...@cpanel.net

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On 2016-03-21 18:37, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.19 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Yes, *sad face*. There was a reason our grandfathers kept everything in one source file... I added the missing line in trunk and 2.4.x. Jan, are you able to verify that the current 2.4.x builds for you? Thanks! -Stefan > Am 22.03.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Ugg, ugg and triple ugg. I have a mind to recall 2.4.19, but will leave the vote open to ensure we don't have problems w/ other platforms before we re-T > On Mar 21, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > > Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 21 Mar 2016

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

> Am 22.03.2016 um 02:49 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt : > > Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:37:40 > -0400): >> [x] +0: meh > > mod_http2.so will not build 'out of the box' on Windows, because > mod_http2.dsp is missing > > # Begin Source File > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On 22/03/2016 03:37, Jim Jagielski wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.19 GA. [x ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:37:40 -0400): >[x] +0: meh mod_http2.so will not build 'out of the box' on Windows, because mod_http2.dsp is missing # Begin Source File SOURCE=./h2_ngn_shed.c # End Source File This leads to build errors like: 1>h2_mplx.obj :