On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> With 72 hours up, and sufficient +1 (binding) votes, I call
> this vote CLOSED with the result of PASS.
>
> I have gone ahead and moved the release artifacts over the
> the required place for the mirrors to sync up.
>
Thanks for RM'ing!
Am 16.12.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0:
With 72 hours up, and sufficient +1 (binding) votes, I call
this vote CLOSED with the result of PASS.
I have gone ahead and moved the release artifacts over the
the required place for the mirrors to sync up.
I will be away (In Tyson's Corner, VA) later today and
all day tomorrow, and the 1st half
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
>
Regre
All fine here on Windows.
Steffen
> Op 16 dec. 2016 om 19:29 heeft Jim Jagielski het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
>
>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VO
> Am 16.12.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
>
> [x] +1: Good to go
macOS 10.12, x64 - event, worker
Ubuntu 14.04 x64 - event, worker
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
>
> [x] +1: Good to go
Ubuntu 16.04 x64, both the httpd (minus ext_filter) and mod_websocket
test suites.
Windows 7 x64, mod_websocket test suite (still can't, for the life of
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
Tested on Debian stretch/sid, jessie, wheezy (amd64).
enable-mods-shared=reallyall
All tests passed (but mod_session's TODOs and known ext_filter case).
It isn't based on the modules/*.so contents, but based on the draft
conf/httpd.conf indicated by apxs.
I had the converse problem, with --enable-modules-all I accidentally loaded
both cgi and cgid.
On Dec 18, 2016 02:43, "Nick Kew" wrote:
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 20:32 -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
>
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 20:32 -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> I think your t/conf/extra.conf is out of date and has the +ExecCGI
> masked out by . So you are getting the perl script
> instead of its output setting nasty headers.
[pre-breakfast post: not yet at the desktop where I ran the tests]
For wh
t/TEST -clean might help
On Dec 17, 2016 19:32, "Eric Covener" wrote:
> I think your t/conf/extra.conf is out of date and has the +ExecCGI
> masked out by . So you are getting the perl script
> instead of its output setting nasty headers.
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
I think your t/conf/extra.conf is out of date and has the +ExecCGI
masked out by . So you are getting the perl script
instead of its output setting nasty headers.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:35:22 -0600
> William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> On Dec 17, 2016
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:35:22 -0600
William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2016 17:22, "Nick Kew" wrote:
>
>
> Got some test errors with the new stuff. Investigating.
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/apache/http_strict.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 78 Failed: 5)
> Failed tes
On Dec 17, 2016 17:22, "Nick Kew" wrote:
Got some test errors with the new stuff. Investigating.
Test Summary Report
---
t/apache/http_strict.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 78 Failed: 5)
Failed tests: 72-75, 77
Really should not occur and I haven't seen this. Shoot me the -
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 23:21:09 +
Nick Kew wrote:
> Got some test errors with the new stuff. Investigating.
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/apache/http_strict.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 78 Failed: 5)
> Failed tests: 72-75, 77
The fails are:
[ "R" . ": bar"
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:29:04 -0500
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
Debian
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> [ ] +1: Good to go
+1. Tested on aix/xlc/ppc64. No regressions (modulo new 413 ext_filter tests)
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Bonus reminder; if you are working from an existing checkout, top level
Makefile.PL plus make must be rerun to provision all new tests correctly.
On Dec 17, 2016 7:13 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> As a reminder, when Joe added those tests a few days ago,
> it was for:
>
> URL: http://svn.apa
Am 16.12.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
[x] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0
As a reminder, when Joe added those tests a few days ago,
it was for:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1774010&view=rev
Log:
Add basic test case for mod_ext_filter & specific test for PR 60375.
> On Dec 17, 2016, at 7:35 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Am 17.12.2016 um 10:46 schri
+1:
o CentOS5, x64 - event, worker
o CentOS6, x64 - event, worker
o CentOS7, x64 - event
o macOS 10.12, x64 - event, worker
No regressions (mod_ext_filter test failures aren't regressions)
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> At long, long last, the pre-release test tarb
Those failures do not reflect a regression.
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> On 12/16/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
>
> mod_ext_filter tests are failing for me on Ubuntu 16.04 x64, but I *think*
>
Am 17.12.2016 um 10:46 schrieb Marion & Christophe JAILLET:
Proposed fix in r1774728.
A solution, stating that the tests have been skipped because of sed
location, would be better, though.
I switched the test to using a simple perl script instead of sed, so
that we have no platform dependenci
Proposed fix in r1774728.
A solution, stating that the tests have been skipped because of sed
location, would be better, though.
CJ
Le 16/12/2016 à 21:46, Jacob Champion a écrit :
On 12/16/2016 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
I expect this is a bug in the 2.4.x branch. However, I found t
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:51 AM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> Color me confused, is this w/w-o the hack for APR_HAVE_TIME_T?
>
Nevermind, that issues is entirely resolved. Thanks for confirmation!
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>
>> Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.
Color me confused, is this w/w-o the hack for APR_HAVE_TIME_T?
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:29:04
> -0500):
> >[x] +1: Good to go
>
> Running without problems on my dev server now.
> Windows 2008 R2, VC9 x86
Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:29:04
-0500):
>[x] +1: Good to go
Running without problems on my dev server now.
Windows 2008 R2, VC9 x86 and VC11, x64
--
Jan
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
> Am 16.12.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Jacob Champion:
>
>> On 12/16/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
>>>
>>
>> mod_ext_filter tests are failing for me on Ubuntu 16.04 x64, but
Am 16.12.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Jacob Champion:
On 12/16/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
mod_ext_filter tests are failing for me on Ubuntu 16.04 x64, but I
*think* this is due to a bug in the tests as opposed to a regression,
On 12/16/2016 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
I expect this is a bug in the 2.4.x branch. However, I found the same
exceptions in 2.4.23 tag, so this is not a regression, and Joe is still
researching what is happening here, so it doesn't seem to be something
we would want to hold up a release
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Jacob Champion
wrote:
> On 12/16/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
>>
>
> mod_ext_filter tests are failing for me on Ubuntu 16.04 x64, but I *think*
> this is due to a bug in the tests as oppo
On 12/16/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
mod_ext_filter tests are failing for me on Ubuntu 16.04 x64, but I
*think* this is due to a bug in the tests as opposed to a regression,
related to the conversation in [1]. Does anyon
At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vot
33 matches
Mail list logo