Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-05 Thread Barry Scott
Ricardo Cantu wrote: On Friday 02 October 2009 11:10:25 am Barry Scott wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: (instead of based on uri or vhost)

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-05 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote: mod_fastcgi's FastCgiServer directive is similar in some respects to the one I propose in this thread, but it has a key difference: It implies that at least one instance/process will be maintained at all times,

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-02 Thread Barry Scott
Jeff Trawick wrote: (instead of based on uri or vhost) FCGIDCommand /path/to/command IdleTimeout n MaxProcessLifetime n MinProcesses n MaxProcesses n MaxRequestsPerProcess n InitialEnv var[=val] ... class (the names of these options follow my proposal for the names of existing

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukwrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: (instead of based on uri or vhost) FCGIDCommand /path/to/command IdleTimeout n MaxProcessLifetime n MinProcesses n MaxProcesses n MaxRequestsPerProcess n InitialEnv var[=val] ...

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-02 Thread Ricardo Cantu
On Friday 02 October 2009 5:35:03 am Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukwrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: (instead of based on uri or vhost) FCGIDCommand /path/to/command IdleTimeout n MaxProcessLifetime n MinProcesses n

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote: On Friday 02 October 2009 5:35:03 am Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote: Is it possible to also ask for the fcgi process to be started before any

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-02 Thread Ricardo Cantu
On Friday 02 October 2009 8:14:14 am Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote: On Friday 02 October 2009 5:35:03 am Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote: Is it possible to

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-02 Thread Barry Scott
Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: (instead of based on uri or vhost) FCGIDCommand /path/to/command IdleTimeout n MaxProcessLifetime n

Re: [mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-02 Thread Ricardo Cantu
On Friday 02 October 2009 11:10:25 am Barry Scott wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: (instead of based on uri or vhost) FCGIDCommand

[mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

2009-10-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
(instead of based on uri or vhost) FCGIDCommand /path/to/command IdleTimeout n MaxProcessLifetime n MinProcesses n MaxProcesses n MaxRequestsPerProcess n InitialEnv var[=val] ... class (the names of these options follow my proposal for the names of existing directives ;) ) When a