Re: Re: mod_fcgid: add mod_status support?
Jeff Trawick wrote: 2009/11/9 pqf p...@mailtech.cn: Hi, all I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support to mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is it a good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's not a good idea, please let me know. Sure. I'd like to see a view of processes and perhaps scores from mod_status. I'd like to see this become an extensible mechansim. It was on the topic list last week until SSL issues got the better of us. I'll post thoughts in the coming week, Aaron, DougM and I have all done some pondering on this subject that would make things cleaner for all. But in terms of 2.0/2.2 legacy fcgid support for scoreboard, Sander's comments are right on. I just finished a version which scan share memory and print out FastCGI process status. just like mod_ssl does. But will the mechansim be changed to an extensible one in the future? external modules like mod_ssl should use another mechansim to do this? Look forward for further discussion in the next week :)
Re: mod_fcgid: add mod_status support?
Jeff Trawick wrote: 2009/11/9 pqf p...@mailtech.cn: Hi, all I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support to mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is it a good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's not a good idea, please let me know. Sure. I'd like to see a view of processes and perhaps scores from mod_status. I'd like to see this become an extensible mechansim. It was on the topic list last week until SSL issues got the better of us. I'll post thoughts in the coming week, Aaron, DougM and I have all done some pondering on this subject that would make things cleaner for all. But in terms of 2.0/2.2 legacy fcgid support for scoreboard, Sander's comments are right on.
Re: mod_fcgid: add mod_status support?
On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:51 PM, pqf wrote: Hi, all I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support to mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is it a good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's not a good idea, please let me know. +1 See mod_ssl.c:314, ssl_scache.c:228 and ssl_scache.c:199 in trunk to see how mod_ssl does it. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
