On 10/29/2006 11:41 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 23:21 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>>>Backport to 2.2.x ? I'm still using 2.0.x - LOL.
>>
>>Have you tried to apply the patches for 2.2.x to 2.0.x? I haven't tried so,
>>but
>>I think mod_deflate has not changed that much betw
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 23:21 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > Backport to 2.2.x ? I'm still using 2.0.x - LOL.
>
> Have you tried to apply the patches for 2.2.x to 2.0.x? I haven't tried so,
> but
> I think mod_deflate has not changed that much between 2.2.x and 2.0.x, so that
> might work. If yo
On 10/25/2006 04:46 PM, Sven Köhler wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>JSP (via mod_jk) and maybe other plugins sometimes flush the
>>>connection,
>>>so that the browsers receive everything that's stuck in some internal
>>>buffer. Here's a quote from mod_jk's docs:
>>>
>>>
>>>JkOptions +FlushPackets
>>>Jk
>> Hi,
>>
>> JSP (via mod_jk) and maybe other plugins sometimes flush the
>> connection,
>> so that the browsers receive everything that's stuck in some internal
>> buffer. Here's a quote from mod_jk's docs:
>>
>>
>> JkOptions +FlushPackets
>> JkOptions FlushPackets, you ask mod_jk to flush Ap
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 07:05, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
> > mod_deflate breaks that. I know the issue from ssh already.
Yep. And Paul's reply refers only to /trunk/, not to released versions.
> I know. There are some patches to fix that. These are proposed for backport
> to 2.2.x:
I'
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: news
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 00:36
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: mod_deflate and flush?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> JSP (via mod_jk) and maybe other plugins sometimes flush the
> connection,
> so that the browsers receive everything that's
