Shouldn't we call apr_brigade_cleanup in any case after ap_pass_brigade?
Regards
Rüdiger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. April 2017 11:47
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1707087 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/m
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. April 2017 10:55
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1707087 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c
>
> Eh, not really into mod_bucketeer
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jacob Champion [mailto:champio...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. April 2017 00:23
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org; Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
>
> Betreff: Re: AW: svn commit: r1707087 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mo
On 02/15/2017 10:10 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
How about creating it from c->pool and storing it in c->notes for the lifetime
of c?
Would that be unsafe for HTTP/2? Can multiple requests (that use
ap_request_core_filter) be active on the same connection at once?
--Jacob
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2017 14:08
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1707087 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c
>
> [with the patch]
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:07 P