Re: Bugzilla flow (Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla)

2007-01-22 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > What I'm most unhappy about is that we have 783 bugs in New, > Assigned, Reopened, NeedInfo... that seems like quite a lot. Perhaps Then let's start and solve two of the 783 so we can these cross off the list +---+

Re: Bugzilla flow (Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla)

2007-01-20 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > What I'm most unhappy about is that we have 783 bugs in New, > Assigned, Reopened, NeedInfo... that seems like quite a lot. Perhaps Then let's start and solve two of the 783 so we can these cross off the list +---+

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-12 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
lör 2007-01-13 klockan 01:06 +0100 skrev Ruediger Pluem: > This could be modified to: > > 1. Fix on trunk => Change state in "Resolved, fixed" and add a comment with > revision >of fix. > 2. Proposed for backport => Leave state in "Resolved, fixed" and add a > comment with >revision of

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-12 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:33:45AM +, Joe Orton wrote: > What is the difference between a "RESOLVED" bug and a "CLOSED" one? Is > it not possible to re-open/add comments to CLOSED reports or something? > It's always seemed like a meaningless distinction to me, going through > marking stuff

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-12 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/12/2007 11:14 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >> On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Joe Orton wrote: >> >>> What is the difference between a "RESOLVED" bug and a "CLOSED" one? Is >>> it not possible to re-open/add comments to CLOSED reports or

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-12 Thread Sander Temme
On Jan 12, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Joe Orton wrote: What is the difference between a "RESOLVED" bug and a "CLOSED" one? Is it not possible to re-open/add comments to CLOSED reports or something? It's always seemed like a meaningless distinction

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:11:18PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote: >> >> Yes, Closed should be the final resting place for bug reports, for >> good or for bad. > > What is the difference between a "RESOLVED" bug and a "CLOSED" one? Is > it not possible to re-open/add comments to

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-12 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Joe Orton wrote: What is the difference between a "RESOLVED" bug and a "CLOSED" one? Is it not possible to re-open/add comments to CLOSED reports or something? It's always seemed like a meaningless distinction to me, going through marking stuff CLOSED seems like

Bugzilla flow (Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla)

2007-01-12 Thread Sander Temme
On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Joe Orton wrote: Yes, Closed should be the final resting place for bug reports, for good or for bad. What is the difference between a "RESOLVED" bug and a "CLOSED" one? Is it not possible to re-open/add comments to CLOSED reports or something? It's always se

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-12 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:11:18PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > >A week sounds good to me. I guess some of them are my fault as I only > >set them to resolved fixed and never visited them again as I thought > >that they reached their fina

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-11 Thread Sander Temme
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: A week sounds good to me. I guess some of them are my fault as I only set them to resolved fixed and never visited them again as I thought that they reached their final state. Now I found out that you only have the option to close it once

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-11 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/11/2007 10:22 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in >>bugzilla? >>Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the >>release process? >>This issue pops up regulary

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-11 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/11/2007 10:12 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 >> in bugzilla? > > > Done. Thanks. > >> Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of >> the

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Hi, > > could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in > bugzilla? > Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the > release process? > This issue pops up regulary after each release. My bad, sorry, it's already been done

Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-11 Thread Sander Temme
On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in bugzilla? Done. Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the release process? This issue pops up regulary after each release. Hard to au

Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla

2007-01-11 Thread Ruediger Pluem
Hi, could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 in bugzilla? Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of the release process? This issue pops up regulary after each release. Regards Rüdiger