Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-02-07 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > I have merged a fix for the MPM-DSO ServerName warnings, so Yann, if you > want to give that a shot and confirm it works for you, I will propose for > backport after I feel relatively certain I haven't broken

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-02-07 Thread Jacob Champion
On 01/24/2017 07:01 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: Just tested with trunk, works fine for me! I haven't done anything special though, will try to do more testing during the next days.. Awesome, thanks for the testing! I have merged a fix for the MPM-DSO ServerName warnings, so Yann, if you want to

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-24 Thread Luca Toscano
2017-01-23 23:58 GMT+01:00 Jacob Champion : > On 01/06/2017 01:00 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > >> Give it a try! With so many ways to configure, I expect *someone* will >> run into a corner case I've missed. >> > > Has anyone else been able to give this a shot? Yann found the

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-23 Thread Jacob Champion
On 01/06/2017 01:00 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: Give it a try! With so many ways to configure, I expect *someone* will run into a corner case I've missed. Has anyone else been able to give this a shot? Yann found the MPM-DSO corner case already. :) If no one else is having any issues, I

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-09 Thread Jacob Champion
On 01/09/2017 01:27 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: However, if there is agreement that the -V behavior should not be changing between static and dynamic MPM configurations, this would be a good motivation to fix that. ;D Hmm, this is probably a much harder problem than it appeared at first glance,

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-09 Thread Jacob Champion
On 01/09/2017 01:14 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: I'm very sorry about my bad testing, this time I forgot "svn up"! I really thought I started with it... No problem! Glad it's working for you now. Modulo some "Config variable ${DOCROOT} is not defined" I get that too; it's not a new behavior

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-09 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > I guess we have to do something for the latter, because we can't > change some file (like the $prefix's httpd.conf with the "legacy" > method) to avoid it, right? Usually a simple "ServerName localhost" in the main

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-09 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: >> On 01/06/2017 04:51 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: >>> >>> Hmm, I haven't tested with dynamic MPM modules; I bet the in-tree 'find' >>> invocation

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-09 Thread Jacob Champion
On 01/09/2017 12:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: On 01/06/2017 04:51 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: Hmm, I haven't tested with dynamic MPM modules; I bet the in-tree 'find' invocation is looking in the wrong place or something.

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-09 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > On 01/06/2017 04:51 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: >> >> Hmm, I haven't tested with dynamic MPM modules; I bet the in-tree 'find' >> invocation is looking in the wrong place or something. > > > Yep, copy-paste error meant

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Jacob Champion wrote: > On 01/06/2017 04:09 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> >>> *NOTE THAT RUNNING 'make check' WILL OVERWRITE YOUR CURRENT TEST >>> CONFIGURATION.* Let me know if this is a problem for you. >> >> >> Not sure what this means, could

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-06 Thread Jacob Champion
On 01/06/2017 04:09 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: *NOTE THAT RUNNING 'make check' WILL OVERWRITE YOUR CURRENT TEST CONFIGURATION.* Let me know if this is a problem for you. Not sure what this means, could you elaborate? To clarify: every time you run `make check`, the Makefile will perform a

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-06 Thread Jacob Champion
On 01/06/2017 04:33 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Scratch that, I missed the ./buildconf, thus my ./configure was outdated... Some further issue, though: httpd: Syntax error on line 66 of /home/yle/src/apache/httpd/trunk/check/conf/httpd.conf: LoadModule takes two arguments, a module name and the

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: >> >> To use it after you've synced up: >> >> ./buildconf >> ./configure --with-test-suite=/absolute/path/to/apache/test >> make

Re: Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-06 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi Jacob, On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > r109 adds a --with-test-suite option for configure that allows you to > run `make && make check`, assuming you already have Apache::Test and its > dependencies installed somewhere. The major nice things

Build-tree testing is now in trunk

2017-01-06 Thread Jacob Champion
r109 adds a --with-test-suite option for configure that allows you to run `make && make check`, assuming you already have Apache::Test and its dependencies installed somewhere. The major nice things here are - you don't have to install the server to test it - all built modules are tested,