Re: Fixing protocol violations in mod_proxy

2007-09-27 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/27/2007 12:42 AM, Nick Kew wrote: * Chunked request with too big chunks: proxy returns 413 Verdict: look at ProxyIOBufferSize * Chunked response with too big chunks: the response is lost completely. Verdict: serious bug!!! What do you mean by too big chunks? * Retry tests:

Re: Fixing protocol violations in mod_proxy

2007-09-27 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:51:50 +0200 Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/27/2007 12:42 AM, Nick Kew wrote: * Chunked request with too big chunks: proxy returns 413 Verdict: look at ProxyIOBufferSize * Chunked response with too big chunks: the response is lost

Re: Fixing protocol violations in mod_proxy

2007-09-27 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:58:01AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:51:50 +0200 Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/27/2007 12:42 AM, Nick Kew wrote: * Chunked response with too big chunks: the response is lost completely. Verdict: serious bug!!! What do

Re: Fixing protocol violations in mod_proxy

2007-09-27 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tor, 2007-09-27 at 14:08 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: From the name I'd presume these are testing a long chunk-extension, not long chunks. There is no 2616 requirement to handle arbitrarily long chunk-extensions so it's a meaningless test, unless httpd is not failing appropriately. (the

Fixing protocol violations in mod_proxy

2007-09-26 Thread Nick Kew
As some of you know, I'm working on fixing bugs in mod_proxy. As part of this effort, I've signed up with a testing service called Co-Advisor, at http://coad.measurement-factory.com/ (who is also responsible for a number of our long-standing bug reports). This gives me use of a good range of