On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:44:48 +0200
Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 25.09.2013 07:33, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> > On 23.09.2013 11:17, Joe Orton wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:32:23PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> >>> Feedback on this approach is again very welcome. Increasing the
> >>> minimum require
On 25.09.2013 07:33, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> On 23.09.2013 11:17, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:32:23PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
>>> Feedback on this approach is again very welcome. Increasing the minimum
>>> required OpenSSL version from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8a shouldn't be of concern,
>>
No guys, who have been on dev@ longer then I.
Regards
Rüdiger
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 25. September 2013 13:31
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Increasing mod_ssl's minimum required OpenSSL version for
trunk/2.4.x to 0.9.8a
On Wed, Sep 25, 20
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote:
> This was less a question to you then to other especially "older" guys
> here, such that we don't miss
> anything here :-).
>
Do you mean guys < v0.9.8
? :p
Regards
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaspar Brand [mailto:httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 25. September 2013 12:20
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Increasing mod_ssl's minimum required OpenSSL version for
> trunk/2.4.x to 0.9.8a
>
> On 25
On 25.09.2013 09:42, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> IMHO 0.9.8 seems reasonable for trunk and 2.4.
> More formal question: Can we do this for 2.4 without breaking any promise?
Sorry for my somewhat naive question, but I guess you need to explain
more specifically (at least to me) what "pro
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaspar Brand > Sent: Mittwoch, 25. September 2013 07:34
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Increasing mod_ssl's minimum required OpenSSL version for
> trunk/2.4.x to 0.9.8a
>
>
> Speaking of mod_ssl in 2.4.x, I can hard
On 23.09.2013 11:17, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:32:23PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
>> Feedback on this approach is again very welcome. Increasing the minimum
>> required OpenSSL version from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8a shouldn't be of concern,
>> IMO, as 0.9.7 is no longer maintained, and 0.
