Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-07-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 07/04/2010 04:38 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 7/1/2010 1:46 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 07/01/2010 03:14 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-07-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 7/1/2010 1:46 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 07/01/2010 03:14 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: On 6/29/2010 9:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread Mark Watts
As a reasonably heavy user of mod_proxy - all our web sites are proxied through a pair of reverse proxies - would you be interested in the problems we have encountered using it? In particular, bug 45950 is symptomatic of our issues. We can't adjust/tune our reverse proxy servers and

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those requests targeted by session

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those requests targeted by session

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mark Watts m.wa...@eris.qinetiq.com wrote: A restart of httpd (graceful or otherwise) has no understanding that the running config can be any different from that on disk. Indeed, how would httpd differentiate between a restart to reconfigure a given balancer

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 30, 2010, at 8:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline,

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline, but

Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-29 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those requests targeted by session to that server. Once the number of sessions settles on

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

2010-06-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 6/29/2010 9:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those requests targeted by session to