Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: On 1/23/2013 11:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: iirc, there were people who did not like that :) Do you mean PPI in *addition to* BI? Yes Fine w/ me... do people agree?

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 22, 2013, at 8:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: As usual, mileage varies. I didn't test the case of a proxypass at server level with a balancer there as well... here is my config: BalancerInherit Off Proxy balancer://mycluster BalancerMember https://127.0.0.1:4433

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/23/2013 11:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: iirc, there were people who did not like that :) Do you mean PPI in *addition to* BI? Yes - I always believe in giving the admin the control to decide the what's and how... The case of ProxyPass at server level (regardless of a balancer in play or

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: On 21.01.2013 15:26, Jim Jagielski wrote: Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On, if a

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/21/2013 3:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: I find it hard to really understand what's going on after applying the patch. Many configuration items are still inherited even with BI Off, but the underlying balancers and/or workers are no longer inherited. Examples are ProxyPass or Proxy. I am

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 20, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: On 1/17/2013 6:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: *ping* :) (yeah, I am kinda pushing/hoping for the balancer stuff to be in 2.4.4 in time for ACNA13) BalancerPersist: Tested fine and works as expected (+1) Side

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/21/2013 8:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On, if a balancer is defined at the top level, then vhosts A and B get their own

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.01.2013 15:26, Jim Jagielski wrote: Disabling BalancerInherit is only needed when using the Balancer Manager and only if there are conflicts between a Balancer in the top-level server and a vhost. With BI On, if a balancer is defined at the top level, then vhosts A and B get their own

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/17/2013 6:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: *ping* :) (yeah, I am kinda pushing/hoping for the balancer stuff to be in 2.4.4 in time for ACNA13) BalancerPersist: Tested fine and works as expected (+1) Side note A lot of folks look at the configuration file as the canonical source for how

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/17/2013 6:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: *ping* :) (yeah, I am kinda pushing/hoping for the balancer stuff to be in 2.4.4 in time for ACNA13) *pong* :) I'm hoping to review those last two on Monday. Been trying for two weeks to get to them! -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
*ping* :) (yeah, I am kinda pushing/hoping for the balancer stuff to be in 2.4.4 in time for ACNA13) On Jan 11, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I think we are quite close to a 2.4.4 release, with just a handful of open proposals in STATUS. If people could review,

Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
I think we are quite close to a 2.4.4 release, with just a handful of open proposals in STATUS. If people could review, test and vote, that would be great.

Re: Plea for eyes (and votes) on STATUS proposals

2013-01-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.01.2013 16:27, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think we are quite close to a 2.4.4 release, with just a handful of open proposals in STATUS. If people could review, test and vote, that would be great. I can do something on Sunday. At least vote in the balancer proposals. Regards, Rainer