On Jan 4, 2009, at 11:57 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Here's the gdb story:
When the content file gets opened, its cleanup is correctly
registered with the request pool. Later in core_filters.c at the end
of function ap_core_output_filter() line 528 we call
setaside_remaining_output().
This
On 01/04/2009 06:28 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 17:57, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> When the content file gets opened, its cleanup is correctly registered
>> with the request pool. Later in core_filters.c at the end of function
>> ap_core_output_filter() line 528 we call setaside_remaining_ou
On 04.01.2009 17:57, Rainer Jung wrote:
When the content file gets opened, its cleanup is correctly registered
with the request pool. Later in core_filters.c at the end of function
ap_core_output_filter() line 528 we call setaside_remaining_output().
...
2.2.x has a different structure, altho
On 04.01.2009 15:04, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too
many open files". I used strace and the problem looks like this:
- The test cas
On 04.01.2009 16:22, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 15:56, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 03:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 15:40, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 03:26 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 14:14, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 11:24 AM, Rainer Jung
On 04.01.2009 15:56, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 03:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 15:40, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 03:26 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 14:14, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 11:24 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 01:51, Ruediger Plu
On 01/04/2009 03:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 15:40, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 01/04/2009 03:26 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> On 04.01.2009 14:14, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 11:24 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 01:51, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> On 01/04/
On 04.01.2009 15:40, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 03:26 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 14:14, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 11:24 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 01:51, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna
On 01/04/2009 03:26 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 14:14, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 01/04/2009 11:24 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> On 04.01.2009 01:51, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
>> Rainer Jung
On 04.01.2009 14:14, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 11:24 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 01:51, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFIL
On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
>> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too
>>> many open files". I used strace and the problem looks like this:
>>>
>>> - The test case is using ab with HTTP kee
On 01/04/2009 11:24 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 01:51, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
> During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too
> many open fi
On 04.01.2009 01:51, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too
many open files". I used strace and the problem looks like this:
- The test cas
On 01/04/2009 12:49 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
>> Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too
>>> many open files". I used strace and the problem looks like this:
>>>
>>> - The test case is using ab with HTTP kee
On 04.01.2009 00:36, Paul Querna wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too
many open files". I used strace and the problem looks like this:
- The test case is using ab with HTTP keep alive, concurrency 20 and a
small file, so doing about 2000
Rainer Jung wrote:
During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too many
open files". I used strace and the problem looks like this:
- The test case is using ab with HTTP keep alive, concurrency 20 and a
small file, so doing about 2000 requests per second.
MaxKeepAliveReque
During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: "Too many
open files". I used strace and the problem looks like this:
- The test case is using ab with HTTP keep alive, concurrency 20 and a
small file, so doing about 2000 requests per second.
MaxKeepAliveRequests=100 (Default)
17 matches
Mail list logo