RE: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-17 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
-Message d'origine- De : Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 10 septembre 2007 12:02 À : dev@httpd.apache.org Objet : Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nick Kew Gesendet: Montag, 10

Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-17 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:33:16 +0200 Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be honest I am still not convinced that the dynamic creation of workers is a good idea at all. Indeedie. I believe I have addressed your concerns in a new patch posted for PR#43308 in which I introduce

RE: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-17 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
-Message d'origine- De : Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2007 12:59 À : dev@httpd.apache.org Objet : Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:33:16 +0200 Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 17, 2007, at 6:58 AM, Nick Kew wrote: Instead of limiting the number and thus creating them randomly (according to what traffic happens to hit the server first), That is part of, I think, both Rüdiger's and my concern. The benefits are this are really really fuzzy when applied to

Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-17 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:29:44 +0200 Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not really see why this should be done in another module, though. How about: 1. It's a well-defined task (isn't it)?, and therefore a natural candidate for a module in a modular server. 2.

RE: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-12 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
-Message d'origine- De : Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 10 septembre 2007 14:00 À : dev@httpd.apache.org Objet : Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: Also the scoreboard

Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-10 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:19:23 +0200 Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will create a Bugzilla report for this issue. That'll be PR#43308, in which you wrote: In Apache 2.2.x a worker, and the associated backend connection pool, is created for each ProxyPass directive. In that

Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nick Kew Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 11:29 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:19:23 +0200 Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: Also the scoreboard is a limiting factor for this. The number of available scoreboard entries is determined during the configuration phase of the startup (it cannot even be changed during graceful starts, this is why we add some

Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers

2007-09-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 4, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: -Message d'origine- De : Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Envoyé : mardi 4 septembre 2007 14:19 À : dev@httpd.apache.org Objet : [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers I will create a Bugzilla report for this