Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-04 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Julian, good day. Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb: Good day! Sorry for rather long letter, but this is the summary from numerous discuissions and I really tried to make it short. ... Hi. RFC2518bis allows the Destination header to

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-04 Thread Julian Reschke
Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb: Julian, good day. Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb: Good day! Sorry for rather long letter, but this is the summary from numerous discuissions and I really tried to make it short. ... Hi. RFC2518bis allows the

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-04 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Julian, Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:12:54PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: Pardon for my stupideness, but what 'that reason' you are talking about? The previous letter was rather long and I fail to identify the exact point you're commenting. Could you, please, elaborate a bit? Sorry. What I

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-04 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
ons 2007-04-04 klockan 13:12 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke: What I meant by reason was the fact that the Destination header (and some aspects of the If header) require absolute URIs, which is problematic when there's a reverse proxy in the transmission path. All the issues around to rewrite

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-04 Thread Julian Reschke
Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb: Julian, Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:12:54PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: Pardon for my stupideness, but what 'that reason' you are talking about? The previous letter was rather long and I fail to identify the exact point you're commenting. Could you, please, elaborate a

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-04 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Julian, Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:22:53PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: So, your point is that Apache should make no attempts to rewrite the 'Destination' header for DAV and clients should use absolute paths for DAV. Or we still need 'Destination' rewriting? In the reverse proxy mode, I mean.

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-04 Thread Julian Reschke
Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb: Julian, Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:22:53PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: So, your point is that Apache should make no attempts to rewrite the 'Destination' header for DAV and clients should use absolute paths for DAV. Or we still need 'Destination' rewriting? In the

Re: Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-03 Thread Julian Reschke
Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb: Good day! Sorry for rather long letter, but this is the summary from numerous discuissions and I really tried to make it short. ... Hi. RFC2518bis allows the Destination header to be just an absolute path for exactly that reason (see

Reverse proxy mode and DAV protocol

2007-04-02 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Good day! Sorry for rather long letter, but this is the summary from numerous discuissions and I really tried to make it short. I happened to notice the wrong behaviour of the Apache proxying modules (originally, mod_proxy, but later the mod_rewrite and essentially, all clients of mod_proxy