On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:05:29 +0200
Falco Schwarz hid...@falco.me wrote:
AFAIK OpenSSL does not support NPN out of the box either and obe
would have to apply patches to the openssl-src in order to get NPN
support. In OpenSSL 1.0.2 ALPN support has been added, though.
OpenSSL 1.0.1 supports NPN
Tend to agree with the other comments, NPN by itself will be
deprecated quickly, ALPN is the future. I'd vote for a series of back
ports that include both NPN and ALPN together.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Any reason to NOT include
Any reason to NOT include
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1332643
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1487772
in 2.4??
On 28 Apr 2014, at 22:50, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Any reason to NOT include
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1332643
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1487772
in 2.4??
I don't think
I have not looked at the patches or ALPN in detail, but I think the
important question is how hard it would be to change this for (or add) ALPN
support. If Chrome is planning to remove NPN support, it does not seem very
useful to add the feature to HTTPD.
- Y
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM,
AFAIK OpenSSL does not support NPN out of the box either and obe would have to
apply patches to the openssl-src in order to get NPN support. In OpenSSL 1.0.2
ALPN support has been added, though.
I know it is easy to say and probably takes a lot of effort to implement, but
wouldn't it be better
