Re: Subrequests, keepalives, mod_proxy in 2.1

2005-07-06 Thread Brian Akins
Graham Leggett wrote: Akins, Brian wrote: Proxy in 2.1 now has a connection pool, and my understanding is that this restriction has fallen away - subrequests should take advantage of the connection pool just like normal requests can. So, can this check be removed? I'll submit a patch when

Subrequests, keepalives, mod_proxy in 2.1

2005-07-01 Thread Akins, Brian
From the best I can tell, subrequests do not get the benefits of keepalives in mod_proxy in 2.1. What is the reason for this? -- Brian Akins Lead Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies

Re: Subrequests, keepalives, mod_proxy in 2.1

2005-07-01 Thread Graham Leggett
Akins, Brian wrote: From the best I can tell, subrequests do not get the benefits of keepalives in mod_proxy in 2.1. What is the reason for this? The original reason was that there was a one to one relationship between a keepalive connection on the browser and a keepalive to the backend. A