Jim Jagielski wrote:
start cutting alpha releases :-)
I suggested a 2.3.3a about a month ago and the silence was deafening.
As wrowe pointed out, there is a lot of work still to do - modules need
to be documented, or marked for removal if abandoned.
If we branched v2.4.x now, we would have
On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
start cutting alpha releases :-)
I suggested a 2.3.3a about a month ago and the silence was deafening.
I don't think we're quite ready to branch trunk yet, there is still
more
work to do, but cutting alphas will
If we are serious about trying to get a 2.4 out this year,
what do people say about branching off trunk at this point,
so we could focus on the required checks while still allowing
trunk to continue unabated?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If we are serious about trying to get a 2.4 out this year,
what do people say about branching off trunk at this point,
so we could focus on the required checks while still allowing
trunk to continue unabated?
-1, until we have votes for a beta/almost GA from trunk, -or-
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If we are serious about trying to get a 2.4 out this year,
what do people say about branching off trunk at this point,
so we could focus on the required checks while still allowing
trunk to continue unabated?
-1, until we have votes for a
On Oct 4, 2009, at 2:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If we are serious about trying to get a 2.4 out this year,
what do people say about branching off trunk at this point,
so we could focus on the required checks while still allowing
trunk to continue unabated?
-1,
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Oct 4, 2009, at 2:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If we are serious about trying to get a 2.4 out this year,
what do people say about branching off trunk at this point,
so we could focus on
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Yep. My only fear, as you state, is without some clear consensus that
we want to get a 2.4 out sometime soon, we will be stuck in that
never-ending loop of polishing the turd. ;)
start cutting alpha
