Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 14, 2011, at 3:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 12/14/2011 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't have any real concept of Release Candidates. I like it that way,

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 15, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: So to make sure I'm clear, what is your recommendation? Another beta or just drop 2.4.0? FWIW, my plan, without a clear RC charter, is to do a final 2.3.x beta (from the httpd-2.4 branch) and then a GA. IMO, there have been too many

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-15 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - On Dec 15, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: So to make sure I'm clear, what is your recommendation? Another beta or just drop 2.4.0? FWIW, my plan, without a clear RC charter, is to do a final 2.3.x beta (from the httpd-2.4 branch) and then a GA.

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/15/2011 8:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 14, 2011, at 3:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 12/14/2011 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't have any real concept

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Okey dokey... Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't have any real concept of Release Candidates. I'm assuming we can simply tag as 2.4.0-RC1 but what about the MMN and the below: #define

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-14 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 14.12.2011 13:09, schrieb Jim Jagielski: Okey dokey... Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't have any real concept of Release Candidates. maybe time to add one? ;-) I'm assuming we can simply tag as

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
This will be done tomorrow: Thurs 12/15. On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... My plan is to TR sometime this week...

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/14/2011 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't have any real concept of Release Candidates. I like it that way, and see no reason to change, especially not now that we are

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-13 Thread Sander Temme
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... My plan is to TR sometime this week... +1, let's do it. S. -- scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread zhiguo zhao
mod_lua document is not match with source code. A lot of instruction removed or added. 2011/12/12 Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote: -1 I think document is not finished. Which documents specifically? I think we'll settle

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote: mod_lua document is not match with source code. A lot of instruction removed or added. I don't personally see this as a release blocker. The doc says it's experimental, and what's there largely works (AFAIK) Specific

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 12, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Eric Covener wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote: mod_lua document is not match with source code. A lot of instruction removed or added. I don't personally see this as a release blocker. The doc says it's experimental,

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday 11 December 2011, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Dec 2011, at 15:01, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... My plan is to TR sometime this week... +1. BTW, is there

Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... My plan is to TR sometime this week...

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-11 Thread Graham Leggett
On 11 Dec 2011, at 15:01, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... My plan is to TR sometime this week... +1. Regards, Graham --

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-11 Thread zhiguo zhao
-1 I think document is not finished. 2011/12/12 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm On 11 Dec 2011, at 15:01, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... My plan is to TR sometime

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

2011-12-11 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote: -1 I think document is not finished. Which documents specifically? I think we'll settle for a long way from finished for documentation, like adequate.