On Dec 14, 2011, at 3:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/14/2011 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
have any real concept of Release Candidates.
I like it that way,
On Dec 15, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
So to make sure I'm clear, what is your recommendation? Another
beta or just drop 2.4.0?
FWIW, my plan, without a clear RC charter, is to do a final
2.3.x beta (from the httpd-2.4 branch) and then a GA.
IMO, there have been too many
- Original Message -
On Dec 15, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
So to make sure I'm clear, what is your recommendation? Another
beta or just drop 2.4.0?
FWIW, my plan, without a clear RC charter, is to do a final
2.3.x beta (from the httpd-2.4 branch) and then a GA.
On 12/15/2011 8:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 14, 2011, at 3:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/14/2011 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
have any real concept
Okey dokey...
Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
have any real concept of Release Candidates.
I'm assuming we can simply tag as 2.4.0-RC1 but what about
the MMN and the below:
#define
Am 14.12.2011 13:09, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Okey dokey...
Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
have any real concept of Release Candidates.
maybe time to add one? ;-)
I'm assuming we can simply tag as
This will be done tomorrow: Thurs 12/15.
On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
My plan is to TR sometime this week...
On 12/14/2011 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's talk about the specifics of carrying this out... the
main issues is how we tag and roll this. Recall that we don't
have any real concept of Release Candidates.
I like it that way, and see no reason to change, especially not now
that we are
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
My plan is to TR sometime this week...
+1, let's do it.
S.
--
scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/
mod_lua document is not match with source code.
A lot of instruction removed or added.
2011/12/12 Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
I think document is not finished.
Which documents specifically? I think we'll settle
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote:
mod_lua document is not match with source code.
A lot of instruction removed or added.
I don't personally see this as a release blocker. The doc says it's
experimental, and what's there largely works (AFAIK)
Specific
On Dec 12, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote:
mod_lua document is not match with source code.
A lot of instruction removed or added.
I don't personally see this as a release blocker. The doc says it's
experimental,
On Sunday 11 December 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 11 Dec 2011, at 15:01, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
My plan is to TR sometime this week...
+1.
BTW, is there
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
My plan is to TR sometime this week...
On 11 Dec 2011, at 15:01, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
My plan is to TR sometime this week...
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
-1
I think document is not finished.
2011/12/12 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm
On 11 Dec 2011, at 15:01, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
My plan is to TR sometime
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
I think document is not finished.
Which documents specifically? I think we'll settle for a long way
from finished for documentation, like adequate.
17 matches
Mail list logo