Re: Vhosts running as different userids (was: Re: Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD)

2007-08-05 Thread Vegard Svanberg
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-05 05:15]: I've looked through the archives, but have not seen this mentioned again since then. I was wondering if this has been discussed any further, possibly moved to other mailing lists, and/or if it's been added to a roadmap for

Re: Vhosts running as different userids (was: Re: Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD)

2007-08-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On 8/5/07, Vegard Svanberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-05 05:15]: I've looked through the archives, but have not seen this mentioned again since then. I was wondering if this has been discussed any further, possibly moved to other mailing

Vhosts running as different userids (was: Re: Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD)

2007-08-04 Thread Vegard Svanberg
In the thread Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD, Paul Querna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Joshua Slive's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) posts on June 25th brings up a streamlined proxy approach (my words) to separate apache processes user ids, most commonly a very much wanted/requested feature in (large) virtual

Re: Vhosts running as different userids (was: Re: Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD)

2007-08-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Vegard Svanberg wrote: In the thread Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD, Paul Querna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Joshua Slive's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) posts on June 25th brings up a streamlined proxy approach (my words) to separate apache processes user ids, most commonly a very much wanted/requested