On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to debug a problem where apparently the accept mutex went bad on
a z/OS system running the worker MPM. I'm guessing that some memory that we
use for the semaphore got clobbered but don't have proof yet. The
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
* Should we yank the squatting logic? I think it is doing us more harm
than good. IIRC it was put in to make the server respond faster when the
workload is spikey.
It finally occurred to me what you meant by spikey:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to debug a problem where apparently the accept mutex went bad
on a z/OS system running the worker MPM. I'm guessing that some memory that
I'm trying to debug a problem where apparently the accept mutex went bad on
a z/OS system running the worker MPM. I'm guessing that some memory that we
use for the semaphore got clobbered but don't have proof yet. The error log
looks like:
[Mon Sep 07 08:01:59 2009] [emerg] (121)EDC5121I
