Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:30:06 -0500
Andy Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are a number of potential workarounds (LocationMatch, or
Multiple Location blocks to deal with the ;* pattern) but it does
seem like this is a bug unless someone can clarify RFC 2396 section
3.3 for
Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:30:06 -0500
Andy Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are a number of potential workarounds (LocationMatch, or
Multiple Location blocks to deal with the ;* pattern) but it does
seem like this is a bug unless someone can clarify RFC 2396 section
3.3 for
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:30:06 -0500
Andy Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a number of potential workarounds (LocationMatch, or
> Multiple Location blocks to deal with the ;* pattern) but it does
> seem like this is a bug unless someone can clarify RFC 2396 section
> 3.3 for me and explai
I just submitted bug 42120. It appears that Apache is improperly (at
least I think it's improper) matching Location blocks when doing
authentication if a path component parameter is passed on.
Specifically, something like this
{Auth stuff}
In this scenario, if I hit http://server/webapp/se