* Dr. Georg Czedik-Eysenberg wrote:
But on the other hand it is now about 4 months,
since I entered the bug report 12395 into Bugzilla
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12395)
and it is still in the state NEW.
snip
this bug should be easy to fix:
mod_rewrite.c, HEAD, line
--On Saturday, December 28, 2002 6:14 PM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the two conditional branches simply have to be swapped. Or better
we could remove the else-branch and put the disabled-check before
the 'if'. Or...?
I like the second option.
if engine is disabled
decline
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I like the second option.
if engine is disabled
decline
if symlinks-not-allowed
error with forbidden
ok, I like this more, too.
Sounds right to me. Feel like coding it up and committing it? =)
oh, just seeing that I have access now ;-)
I'm currently
--On Saturday, December 28, 2002 10:58 PM +0100 André Malo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm. what's the general strategy? leaving non-critical bugs in
(older versions ;-) or decide for every case, what should be done?
I think it should be decided on a case-by-case basis. For 2.0, we
have the
