Paul Querna wrote:
Graham
Leggett wrote:
This block of code definitely belongs in
apr-util, you are 100% right - but moving it to apr-util is a
completely separate issue to fixing the bug as committed.
Then this 'bug' should be submitted as a bug in APR-Util, not httpd.
Not rea
Paul Querna wrote:
This block of code definitely belongs in apr-util, you are 100% right
- but moving it to apr-util is a completely separate issue to fixing
the bug as committed.
Then this 'bug' should be submitted as a bug in APR-Util, not httpd.
Definitely not - like I said, the issue of the
Graham Leggett wrote:
This block of code definitely belongs in apr-util, you are 100% right -
but moving it to apr-util is a completely separate issue to fixing the
bug as committed.
Then this 'bug' should be submitted as a bug in APR-Util, not httpd.
So far this code will only be moved in httpd
Paul Querna wrote:
mod_auth_ldap: Handle the inconsistent way in which the MS LDAP
library handles special characters.
It seems like this is something that belongs in APR-Util. Wouldn't any
application that needed to escape characters in an LDAP filter end up
copying this code?
This block o
Well and good, just don't lose the fix from 2.1 or 2.0 in the process.
Otherwise, I don't care where the fix goes.
--
Jess Holle
Paul Querna wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
minfrin 2004/10/04 16:43:20
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/aaa mod_authnz_ldap.c
Log:
mod_a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
minfrin 2004/10/04 16:43:20
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/aaa mod_authnz_ldap.c
Log:
mod_auth_ldap: Handle the inconsistent way in which the MS LDAP
library handles special characters.
It seems like this is something that belongs in APR-Ut
