Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server util.c

2004-09-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 1 Sep 2004 15:14:33 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: trawick 2004/09/01 08:14:33 Modified:.CHANGES server util.c Log: Fix the handling of URIs containing %2F when AllowEncodedSlashes is enabled. Previously, such urls would still

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server util.c

2004-09-01 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: I can't see how this ever worked before :( Any comments from the crowd? FWIW, I fised that one in the proxy context about two months ago. But I haven't looked at it in the general case. -- Nick Kew

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server util.c

2004-09-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:36:07 +0100 (BST), Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: I can't see how this ever worked before :( Any comments from the crowd? FWIW, I fised that one in the proxy context about two months ago. But I haven't looked at it in the

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server util.c

2004-09-01 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:36:07 +0100 (BST), Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I fised that one in the proxy context about two months ago. But I haven't looked at it in the general case. was that this change entry? *) mod_proxy: multiple

cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server util.c

2001-12-02 Thread Brian Pane
Note: given the role of this function in keeping requests inside the document root, I've tested this new code against the standard boundary cases like /./../foo and /foo/../../bar. If anyone has specific additional test cases or points of concern, though, please let me know. Thanks, --Brian