Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 ROADMAP STATUS

2001-11-27 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:19:40AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrowe 01/11/26 21:19:39 Modified:.STATUS Added: .ROADMAP Log: OK... we keep deferring these issues, it's time for a ROADMAP. Jump in everyone. I think the ROADMAP file

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 ROADMAP STATUS

2001-11-27 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 07:37 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:19:40AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrowe 01/11/26 21:19:39 Modified:.STATUS Added: .ROADMAP Log: OK... we keep deferring these issues, it's time

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 ROADMAP STATUS

2001-11-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:45 PM My guess is that once 2.0 goes GA, we'll all be busy fixing bugs and working on more fun stuff for a while. Also, take a look at everything in the ROADMAP file. 99% of it can be done as a dot release in the 2.0

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 ROADMAP STATUS

2001-11-27 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 08:31 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 07:45:38PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: My guess is that once 2.0 goes GA, we'll all be busy fixing bugs and working on more fun stuff for a while. Also, take a look at everything in the ROADMAP file. 99%