William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
to pound it into the msdev's head. please fix/revert.
-# ... /dll /incremental:no /debug /machine:I386
/base:@os\win32\BaseAddr.ref,libhttpd.dll /opt:ref
+# ... /dll /debug /machine:I386
From: Allan Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:38 PM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
to pound it into the msdev's head. please fix/revert.
-# ... /dll /incremental:no /debug /machine:I386
At 12:37 PM 3/5/2004, Allan Edwards wrote:
Looks like MSDEV fooness to me. I changed nothing in the project except
adding the eoc file but I can't coax MSDEV into including /incremental:no
in the dsp even though it *is* there in the Link Project Options box.
this is why I always add sources (in
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:43 PM
At 12:37 PM 3/5/2004, Allan Edwards wrote:
Looks like MSDEV fooness to me. I changed nothing in the project except
adding the eoc file but I can't coax MSDEV into including /incremental:no
in the dsp
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:49:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2004/03/01 09:49:52
Modified:.libhttpd.dsp
Log:
add eoc_bucket.c to project
I'm not qualified to review Win32 changes but did you mean to remove
/incremental:no from the linker flags here as
At 09:09 AM 3/4/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:49:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2004/03/01 09:49:52
Modified:.libhttpd.dsp
Log:
add eoc_bucket.c to project
I'm not qualified to review Win32 changes but did you mean to remove
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove flags that it finds
redundant, even ones that it added itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like that.
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
to pound it into the
At 12:00 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove
flags that it finds redundant, even ones that it added
itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like that.
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes
At 12:04 PM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
At 12:00 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove flags that it finds
redundant, even ones that it added itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like that.
At 01:33 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:04 PM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
At 12:00 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove
flags that it finds redundant, even ones that it added
At 01:39 AM 7/18/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 2002/07/17 23:39:06
Revision ChangesPath
1.49 +134 -154 httpd-2.0/libhttpd.dsp
David... I knocked out the header you pointed out, along with a number
of duplicated entries for the headers we now move about into include/
I like! Will do some testing on NT 4.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 libhttpd.dsp
wrowe 02/05/24 08:16:53
Modified:.libhttpd.dsp
Log:
We appear
12 matches
Mail list logo
