On Die 20.06.2006 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[snipped]
A past discussion of very closely related functionality, though not
exactly what you asked for originally, yielded multiple interested
admin-type folks and no developers expressing interest other than
myself.
Sorry, i think i have
On Die 20.06.2006 18:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
A past discussion of very closely related functionality, though not
exactly what you asked for originally, yielded multiple interested
admin-type folks and no developers expressing interest other than
myself.
And also
i'm not sure that only apr solution because is httpd information to log... no hook only information...but can be acheve with hook of hook... and this idea can be posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]but can be apache hook impl super macro to acheve this...and the information to log rely on apache log
Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/16/2006 10:28 PM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Any opinion from the developer, to this issue?!
On Don 01.06.2006 08:14, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the
flow of
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is definately useful for module developers, and should be added.
+1. it is also useful, when you have strange things happening to
production web servers. I, too, did a rather ugly hack that shouwed the
current hook using mod_status hook and it has come in
On Mon 19.06.2006 07:07, Jeff Trawick wrote:
If httpd *developers* are interested, we should decide what type of
processing is acceptable/required first and worry about whether it can
be fitted into apr second. As I recall from the last discussion of this
perhaps 15 months ago, most all of the
On 6/20/06, Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 19.06.2006 07:07, Jeff Trawick wrote:
If httpd *developers* are interested, we should decide what type of
processing is acceptable/required first and worry about whether it can
be fitted into apr second. As I recall from the last
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 6/20/06, Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 19.06.2006 07:07, Jeff Trawick wrote:
If httpd *developers* are interested, we should decide what type of
processing is acceptable/required first and worry about whether it can
be fitted into apr second. As I
On 6/18/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/18/2006 04:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not
possible
out of the box.
It
i think is very usefull to have this in production environment... to debug probleme without interupting production... in only up the log level with reload...with strace you must restart apache with strace...and for desactivating it you must restart... in some production environement is not
On 06/18/2006 02:49 PM, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
i think is very usefull to have this in production environment... to debug
probleme without interupting production... in only up the log level with
reload...
with strace you must restart apache with strace...and for desactivating it
you
On 6/17/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not possible
out of the box.
It may
ok i've forget that possibility :)but using strace directly by attaching to processus can be risky in production (like gdb!)... and with apache with 256 or 512 processuss all working can be hard to debug...in some time have lost the processus...by attempting to attach to it...and yes is
On Son 18.06.2006 22:25, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
ok i've forget that possibility :)
but using strace directly by attaching to processus can be risky in
production (like gdb!)...
and with apache with 256 or 512 processuss all working can be hard to
debug...
in some time have lost the
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:25:27PM +0200, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
but using strace directly by attaching to processus can be risky in
production (like gdb!)... and with apache with 256 or 512 processuss
all working can be hard to debug...
*shrug*, I regulary attach tracers to apache with
On 06/18/2006 04:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not
possible
out of the box.
It may be possible if you modify the hook macros.
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/18/2006 02:49 PM, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
i think is very usefull to have this in production environment... to debug
probleme without interupting production... in only up the log level with
reload...
with strace you must restart apache
On Son 18.06.2006 21:42, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Anyway, as others have pointed out, this topic is off-topic here.
Sorry for that, which list is the right one from your point of view?
Regards
Alex
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 12:03:57AM +0200, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Sorry for that, which list is the right one from your point of view?
dev@apr.apache.org :-)
--
Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/16/2006 10:28 PM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Any opinion from the developer, to this issue?!
On Don 01.06.2006 08:14, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the
flow of a request?
eg:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not possible
out of the box.
It may be possible if you modify the hook macros.
And do you think that the developer would accept a
On Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not possible
out of the box.
It may be possible if you modify the hook macros.
On Sam 17.06.2006 13:14, Nick Kew wrote:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not
possible out of the box.
It may be
Any opinion from the developer, to this issue?!
On Don 01.06.2006 08:14, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Hi,
i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked me
follwing:
Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the
flow of a request?
eg:
$REQUEST accepted on
Hi,
i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked me
follwing:
Is it possible to get a logentry from the hooks in apache to see the
flow of a request?
eg:
$REQUEST accepted on $FD
$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx
$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx
$REQUEST handled by $MOD_xxx
it's a very good idea to add this!From: Alexander Lazic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:14:11 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] debug apacheHi,i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked mefollwing:Is it possible to get a logentry
26 matches
Mail list logo
