Re: json, rather sooner than later

2017-03-31 Thread Nick Kew
> On 31 Mar 2017, at 13:51, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > Hey, I'm currently evaluating some addition to httpd that needs to > parse/serialize JSON. > I know not everyone is a fan of that format, but some protocols do require it > (I try to > spare us a discussion about "better" formats :-). >

Re: json, rather sooner than later

2017-03-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > > I would model this the same way we model XML - we have a compatibility layer > in APR, and support one (maybe more) json parsers. > > Definite +1 to the concept, and given that YAML is now the new hipster cool, > we might do that at

Re: json, rather sooner than later

2017-03-31 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Ok, if I understand you right, this we would add as an external dependency, > detected via configure and friends and used from a new module. Then linking > in a MIT API should be just fine. > > But how about using JSON in Apache core? How wo

Re: json, rather sooner than later

2017-03-31 Thread Graham Leggett
On 31 Mar 2017, at 2:51 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Hey, I'm currently evaluating some addition to httpd that needs to > parse/serialize JSON. > I know not everyone is a fan of that format, but some protocols do require it > (I try to > spare us a discussion about "better" formats :-). > > D

Re: json, rather sooner than later

2017-03-31 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 31.03.2017 um 15:21 schrieb Eric Covener : > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> Hey, I'm currently evaluating some addition to httpd that needs to >> parse/serialize JSON. >> I know not everyone is a fan of that format, but some protocols do require >> it (I try

Re: json, rather sooner than later

2017-03-31 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Hey, I'm currently evaluating some addition to httpd that needs to > parse/serialize JSON. > I know not everyone is a fan of that format, but some protocols do require it > (I try to > spare us a discussion about "better" formats :-). > >

json, rather sooner than later

2017-03-31 Thread Stefan Eissing
Hey, I'm currently evaluating some addition to httpd that needs to parse/serialize JSON. I know not everyone is a fan of that format, but some protocols do require it (I try to spare us a discussion about "better" formats :-). Does anyone have ideas/preferences about bringing JSON into httpd (