Thanks, that is the information that I was looking for. I just wanted
to raise the issue because I wasn't sure if there were any other uses
for mod_ldap besides auth_ldap. It appears that there is and that is
reason enough to leave it as is. Although I do agree that mod_ldap
should be renamed
--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:39 PM +0100 Dirk-Willem van Gulik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One 'ultimate' way to proof how much sense it would make is by
using it to do simply/do some clever apache/tomcat connection
pooling.
For that, you should use apr_reslist_t. IIRC, it was written for
While we are on the subject of splitting auth_ldap, does it still make
sense to have mod_auth_ldap and mod_ldap? Would it make more sense to
combine these two modules. It seems that the split was initially due to
trying to include the ldap connection caching in apr-util. Since that
is no longer
