On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 08:38:31AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
...
By the way, for those interested in reading about our best pool
practices philosophy, take a look at Subversion's HACKING guidelines
-- at the section called APR pool usage conventions. These are the
magic formulas that
- Original Message -
DATE: 29 May 2003 17:47:08 -050
From: Ben Collins-Sussman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let's hope Ben stays interested ;). Even after he now discovered
the issue isn't that big for Subversion
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. revamp mod_dav's use of pools internally.
This means adding pool arguments to the various layers of
function calls within mod_dav. Each caller controls subpool
creation, and possibly passes a subpool into a subordinate function
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:15 PM
At 01:12 PM 5/28/2003, you wrote:
Comments inline, but kudos for taking this on...
1. revamp mod_dav's use of pools internally.
This means adding pool arguments to the various layers of
--On Friday, May 30, 2003 12:39 AM +0200 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Let's hope Ben stays interested ;). Even after he now discovered the issue
isn't that big for Subversion anymore... :) :) [Hi Ben]
Nah, Ben just found another rathole that needs fixing in dav_method_propfind,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:39 PM
3. use the API versioning which is present in httpd-2.0 (and later) to
define two back-end interfaces for mod_dav. The current interface
is v1, and the new pool accepting interface becomes v2. mod_dav
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let's hope Ben stays interested ;). Even after he now discovered
the issue isn't that big for Subversion anymore... :) :) [Hi Ben]
Yeah... I just mentioned this on the Subversion dev list.
Basically, it looks like the emergency memory-usage problem no
Hi, I'm a new subscriber to this list, but not a complete stranger
either. My name is Ben Collins-Sussman, and I'm one of the original
Subversion developers. I'm also an APR committer, and well... I know
a whole lot of people on this list, and met many more of you at the
last Apachecon.
I'm
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
[...]
I'm writing because I plan to do some major overhauling of mod_dav.
No need to fear, because I'm essentially a disciple of gstein. :-)
I'm reasonably familiar with mod_dav code already, because I'm
intimate with the mod_dav_svn provider (Subversion's main
roviders, such as mod_dav_fs.
Comments?
I am not a heavy dav user, but definitely +1 to getting mod_dav to work
better with svn.
Bill
At 01:12 PM 5/28/2003, you wrote:
Hi, I'm a new subscriber to this list, but not a complete stranger
either.
Hi Ben... around here you are no stranger than most :-)
I'm writing because I plan to do some major overhauling of mod_dav.
Comments inline, but kudos for taking this on...
1. revamp
At 01:41 PM 5/28/2003, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
Chris Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes yes yes! If you need help, I'm a willing
sucker/victim/volunteer. ;^o As is, I'm sure, all of the Catacomb
back-end developers. (I've cc'd the Catacomb mailing list.) Perhaps it
would be worthwhile to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:32 AM -0700 Chris Knight
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Catacomb mailing list.) Perhaps it would be worthwhile to branch off
to a
sub mailing list for this effort?
Nah. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just fine, thank you. =)
Yep, keep the
On Wed, 28 May 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It makes me wonder... today we have to create and destroy the pool.
But what about reuse? The overhead of creating the pool itself? It seems
like a good extention to the apr_pool api if we had an apr_pool_recycle
function that would do the
At 02:50 PM 5/28/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It makes me wonder... today we have to create and destroy the pool.
But what about reuse? The overhead of creating the pool itself? It seems
like a good extention to the apr_pool api if we had an
Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_dav overhaul
At 02:50 PM 5/28/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It makes me wonder... today we have to create
16 matches
Mail list logo
