Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
Hi,
my name is Piotr Gackiewicz and I am the autor of these patches.
I confirm, that I personaly consider them as minor changes and agree, that
you should put them into "minor patch" group. Without signing CLA and official
Software Grant.
I appreciate transferring this
idea. If Piotr
> Gackiewicz think his job is "simple repairs", I think these patchs can
> be put to "minor patch" group too.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Darroch"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 1:31
Hi, guys
Good news is I track down another author now. We are talking about the
license questions now, so far so good :)
Thanks
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Chris Darroch"
> 发送时间: 2009年1月1日 星期四
> 收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: mod_fcgid license questions
Hi --
On 31 Dec 2008, at 05:48, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Foes anyone have a sense of whether these would indeed require
a CLA and SGA?
They look like simple repairs to me. More importantly, if he thinks
they are simple repairs and he is happy to see them Apache Licensed,
then there is no ne
On 31 Dec 2008, at 05:48, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Foes anyone have a sense of whether these would indeed require
a CLA and SGA?
They look like simple repairs to me. More importantly, if he thinks
they are simple repairs and he is happy to see them Apache Licensed,
then there is no need for
;, I think these patchs can be put to "minor patch" group too.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Darroch"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: mod_fcgid license questions
> pqf wrote:
>
>> version 1.10 ( Jul 3rd 2006 )
&g
On Dec 31, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
pqf wrote:
version 1.10 ( Jul 3rd 2006 )
1. Use poll() instead of select() in UNIX. It becomes problematic on
apache2 with large number of logfiles. Apache2 calls poll()
(when OS supports it), and in that case it doesn't need to be
reco
pqf wrote:
version 1.10 ( Jul 3rd 2006 )
1. Use poll() instead of select() in UNIX. It becomes problematic on
apache2 with large number of logfiles. Apache2 calls poll()
(when OS supports it), and in that case it doesn't need to be recompiled
with larger FD_SETSIZE. select() is still li
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:43:01 -0800
Chris Darroch wrote:
> pqf wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the delay, I have track down all patches base on my
> > ChangeLog ( I keep my mail archive), so here is my brief:
>
> > Minor patches
> > ...Ignore here, I attach a file to show every modification to
> > ev
pqf wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I have track down all patches base on my ChangeLog
( I keep my mail archive), so here is my brief:
Minor patches
...Ignore here, I attach a file to show every modification to
every ChangeLog entry. (If anyone think any change is major, please
let me know)
On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/16/2008 10:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris Darroch wrote:
pqf wrote:
For the moment, though, I think we're just waiting for some
feedback from other httpd developers and especially those with
some experience of the Incub
download.php?group_id=174879&atid=870993&file_id=218023&aid=1670268,
author is https://sourceforge.net/users/timjensen66/)
So, that mean there are other two people are involved.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Darroch"
To:
Sent: Thursday, Dece
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
How many are we talking about (in the significant category)? The
easiest way probably depends on how many people, how easy they are
to contact, etc.
Ryan, do you have a rough sense of this?
From my own review of the ChangeLog, it looks like there are
roughly a
On 12/16/2008 10:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Chris Darroch wrote:
>> pqf wrote:
>>
>> For the moment, though, I think we're just waiting for some
>> feedback from other httpd developers and especially those with
>> some experience of the Incubator process. I or someone else likely
>>
Chris Darroch wrote:
> pqf wrote:
>
>> I have signed the two documents
>> ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt and
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/iclas), and emailed the scan
>> version to secretary at apache.org.
>
>> So what I should do next is? Should I contact all major cont
pqf wrote:
I have signed the two documents
( http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/iclas), and emailed the scan
version to secretary at apache.org.
So what I should do next is? Should I contact all major contributors
and ask for the agreement to
aturday, December 13, 2008 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: mod_fcgid license questions
> pqf wrote:
>> Hi, guys
>> Nice to meet you :) I hope I can help to clarify the questions.
>
> Likewise :)
>
>>>When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
>
pqf wrote:
> Hi, guys
> Nice to meet you :) I hope I can help to clarify the questions.
Likewise :)
>>When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
>>from mod_fastcgi?
> No. I didn't borrow any code from mod_fastcgi.
That's good - we are looking at the headers you u
pqf wrote:
When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
from mod_fastcgi?
No. I didn't borrow any code from mod_fastcgi.
Your current intention is for mod_fcgid to be available under
the GPL version 2.0, correct? Could you confirm that you wanted
the GPL to
ance. It's my pleasure if
ASF willing to take it over.
Anything I can help please let me know :)
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Darroch"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:15 AM
Subject: mod_fcgid license questions
> Hi --
>
> I believe Pan Qingf
Hi --
I believe Pan Qingfeng (潘庆峰), the developer of mod_fcgid, has
joined this list for the time being while the possibility of mod_fcgid
becoming project in the Apache incubator is discussed. I'll use his
English name of Ryan Pan from here on.
I asked Ryan to join so that he could answer
21 matches
Mail list logo
