Hi (again :-),
* Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
--On Thursday, March 6, 2003 12:42 PM -0500 Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
* session cache store should be pluggable
I'd like to speak with the person who's behind this, as I'm waiting for
(Pardon me while
-- Original Message --
From: Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nonetheless, I'd like to know who the person(s) are that are behind the
statement in the STATUS file so that I can find out what it is (exactly)
that they mean and what (if any) history there is to the idea. session
cache store should be
Hi,
* John K. Sterling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As justin said, this is something that has been randomly discussed from
time to time for many years now. MANY people see the need for this for
obvious reasons.
As for the STATUS file entry, the concrete meaning (from a high level):
1)
--On Thursday, March 6, 2003 12:42 PM -0500 Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
linking apache. I'm wondering if the above problem is a consequence of
us explicitly setting linker syntax and not letting autotools do their
job properly? Anyway, the patch is there if someone wants to see if it
