On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Now you and a recent, unrepeatable crash on my stress test made me
> nervous. The mplx alloc mutex goes back in now, I want to sleep at
> night... ;-)
Sorry about that, although I already knew that counting mutexes was
better than counting
Now you and a recent, unrepeatable crash on my stress test made me nervous. The
mplx alloc mutex goes back in now, I want to sleep at night... ;-)
> Am 22.02.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Stefan Eissing
>
> Am 22.02.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 21.02.2017 um 18:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>>>
>>> We are back to initial issue here, no?
>>
>>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
>> Am 21.02.2017 um 18:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>>
>> We are back to initial issue here, no?
>
> Surely hope not. All subpools of mplx->pool are guarded by mplx->lock mutex
> already.
> Am 21.02.2017 um 18:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:18 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_mplx.c
>> URL:
>>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:18 PM, wrote:
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_mplx.c
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_mplx.c?rev=1783912=1783911=1783912=diff
>