Re: svn commit: r1800307 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-06-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Jun 30, 2017, at 11:43 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special? > > It fixes a regression in the last release, I think it's close

Re: svn commit: r1800307 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-06-30 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special? It fixes a regression in the last release, I think it's close enough in spirit as a showstopper.

Re: svn commit: r1800307 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-06-30 Thread Luca Toscano
2017-06-30 17:34 GMT+02:00 Jacob Champion : > On 06/30/2017 08:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> -1 on showstopper. It's a bug, no security implications, cope with it. >> >> Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special? >> > > It's a reinstatement of my

Re: svn commit: r1800307 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-06-30 Thread Jacob Champion
On 06/30/2017 08:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: -1 on showstopper. It's a bug, no security implications, cope with it. Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special? It's a reinstatement of my previous 2.4.26 showstopper, which got no objections, was unaddressed by the

Re: svn commit: r1800307 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-06-30 Thread William A Rowe Jr
-1 on showstopper. It's a bug, no security implications, cope with it. Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special? That said, unconditional +1 to any mod_proxy_fcgi.c patches you or Jim or any committers determine for backport, I'd prefer we treat the module as experimental