* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if (r-header_only)
- status = OK;
+ if (r-header_only) {
+ return OK;
+}
Actually I think, any code that checks for header_only is wrong. The core
will take care of it. Not treating HEAD requests special ensures, that the
RFC
André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if (r-header_only)
- status = OK;
+ if (r-header_only) {
+ return OK;
+}
Actually I think, any code that checks for header_only is wrong. The core
will take care of it. Not treating HEAD requests special
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 12:08:15PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Except when we get a HEAD request, r-path_info is filled with bogus
data, which causes mod_mbox to crash way deep inside itself.
Why isn't r-path_info filled out correctly?
If the request's path_info itself is bogus, that should be
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 12:08:15PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Except when we get a HEAD request, r-path_info is filled with bogus
data, which causes mod_mbox to crash way deep inside itself.
Why isn't r-path_info filled out correctly?
If the request's path_info itself
