Re: svn commit: r536291 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2007-05-09 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On May 8, 2007, at 11:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +#define USE_ALTERNATE_IS_CONNECTED 1 + +#if !defined(APR_MSG_PEEK) defined(MSG_PEEK) +#define APR_MSG_PEEK MSG_PEEK +#endif + +#if USE_ALTERNATE_IS_CONNECTED defined(APR_MSG_PEEK) Huh? Why are we polluting macro space with useless

Re: svn commit: r536291 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2007-05-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 9, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On May 8, 2007, at 11:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +#define USE_ALTERNATE_IS_CONNECTED 1 + +#if !defined(APR_MSG_PEEK) defined(MSG_PEEK) +#define APR_MSG_PEEK MSG_PEEK +#endif + +#if USE_ALTERNATE_IS_CONNECTED defined(APR_MSG_PEEK)

Re: svn commit: r536291 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2007-05-09 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On May 9, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 9, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On May 8, 2007, at 11:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +#define USE_ALTERNATE_IS_CONNECTED 1 + +#if !defined(APR_MSG_PEEK) defined(MSG_PEEK) +#define APR_MSG_PEEK MSG_PEEK +#endif + +#if

Re: svn commit: r536291 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2007-05-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 9, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On May 9, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 9, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On May 8, 2007, at 11:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +#define USE_ALTERNATE_IS_CONNECTED 1 + +#if !defined(APR_MSG_PEEK) defined(MSG_PEEK)