Many thanks to Ruediger for reviewing 2.0 and 2.2 so far, and to both
Jim and Jeff for their reviews of current/2.2 modern flavors. I could
use a set of eyeballs on the final log.c patch for 2.2, and the patch
set for our old 'n crusty 2.0.
I'm especially interested if any Win32 folks want to
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Montag, 27. August 2007 10:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r569947 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
So the model didn't work, and for NT I propose to stop inheriting the
handles other than
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Many thanks to Ruediger for reviewing 2.0 and 2.2 so far, and to both
Jim and Jeff for their reviews of current/2.2 modern flavors. I could
use a set of eyeballs on the final log.c patch for 2.2, and the patch
set for our old 'n crusty 2.0.
I'm especially interested
Plüm wrote:
I wouldn't say that it is a no-op on Unix. Some logger programs might
expect an open stderr, even if this points to /dev/null. So I am not in
favour of this patch. Besides I understood that we no longer support
Win9x. So why making an exception here?
IMHO if things do not work
