Re: svn commit: r572298 - /httpd/site/trunk/dist/tools/release.sh

[Martin Kraemer]

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:44:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Author: jim
 Date: Mon Sep  3 05:44:06 2007
 New Revision: 572298
 
 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572298view=rev
 Log:
 2.2 and later will wait for this APR tag...

 -apr_tag=1.2.9
 -apu_tag=1.2.8
 +apr_tag=1.2.11
 +apu_tag=1.2.9

Looks like the apu_tag is 1.2.10, or am I mistaken?

   Martin
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Fujitsu Siemens
http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html | 81730  Munich,  Germany

Re: svn commit: r572298 - /httpd/site/trunk/dist/tools/release.sh

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Do we want to pick up the new apr-util's which now include Roy's
commits to pick up db 4.6 and other fun test/ fixes?  (including
running a bunch of tests which were previously 'interactively'
somewhat useless).

Just asking, I'll roll both apr's and apu's, or just apr's.  Whichever
is fine by me (at least apu didn't have the regression headaches.)

  apr_xxx_in_srclib=1
 -apr_tag=1.2.10
 +apr_tag=1.2.11
  apu_tag=1.2.9

  
  apr_xxx_in_srclib=1
 -apr_tag=1.2.9
 -apu_tag=1.2.8
 +apr_tag=1.2.11
 +apu_tag=1.2.9

Re: svn commit: r572298 - /httpd/site/trunk/dist/tools/release.sh

[Jim Jagielski]

We'll pick up all the latest tags... :)

On Sep 3, 2007, at 8:55 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:


Do we want to pick up the new apr-util's which now include Roy's
commits to pick up db 4.6 and other fun test/ fixes?  (including
running a bunch of tests which were previously 'interactively'
somewhat useless).

Just asking, I'll roll both apr's and apu's, or just apr's.  Whichever
is fine by me (at least apu didn't have the regression headaches.)


 apr_xxx_in_srclib=1
-apr_tag=1.2.10
+apr_tag=1.2.11
 apu_tag=1.2.9




 apr_xxx_in_srclib=1
-apr_tag=1.2.9
-apu_tag=1.2.8
+apr_tag=1.2.11
+apu_tag=1.2.9